Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 4 January 2014 08:31, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: I really don't understand the aversion to allowing contributors to police on their own what files they do and don't commit in a review to an OpenStack project. It all boils down to the following balancing act: I have *no*

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 6 January 2014 05:18, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: I think people are conflating two different global concepts here... There had been a discussion about synchronizing the .gitignore files of all projects into one central list (a la openstack/requirements synchronization):

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-10 21:57:33 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote: I have *no* aversion to allowing contributors to police things on their own. [...] I know you don't. It was stated in the message I was replying to (in context you trimmed) that ...the community should not accept or promote any policy

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 11 January 2014 15:39, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2014-01-10 22:00:40 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote: [...synchronized .gitignore across all projects...] Out of curiousity, why wouldn't it work? The example I gave earlier in the thread... one project wants

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-05 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Rushi Agrawal's message of 2014-01-05 05:41:58 -0800: I can see people arguing in future over which top IDE's/editor's trashfiles should or shouldn't be included in the gitignores. Also, I believe the concept of global gitignore is a fantastic one. Has it ever actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-05 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-05 07:40:52 -0800 (-0800), Clint Byrum wrote: [...] We have Oslo for algorithms, not configurations. We have global requirements to control external _dependencies_. This is about neither. Leave them in, add them when people submit them. How is this at all hard or controversial to

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-03 Thread Sam Harwell
, Sam -Original Message- From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 10:46 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore Hey Everyone, I wanted to see where we stand on IDE

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-01-03 19:10:28 + (+), Sam Harwell wrote: OpenStack does not have operational or administrative ownership over the computers used by contributors. As such, the community should not accept or promote any policy which suggests a configuration that alters the behavior of systems

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I wanted to see where we stand on IDE extensions in .gitignore files. We seem to have some back and forth, one cycle there's a bug and a patch to add things like eclipse, idea etc and the next there's a bug and a patch to remove them. I'd like to have some sort of consensus on what

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2013-12-31 09:45:38 -0700 (-0700), John Griffith wrote: [...] Anyway, I'd like to see all of the projects agree on this... or even consider moving to a global .gitignore. Thoughts?? Personal opinion, the per-project .gitignore should be reserved exclusively for autogenerated artifacts tools

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:45 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote: Hey Everyone, I wanted to see where we stand on IDE extensions in .gitignore files. We seem to have some back and forth, one cycle there's a bug and a patch to add things like eclipse, idea etc and the next

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
I am not sure if this is the global .gitignore you are thinking of but this is the one I am in favor of: https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files#global-gitignore Maintaining .gitignore in 30+ repositories for a potentially infinite number of editors is very hard, and thankfully we

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:45 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey Everyone, I wanted to see where we stand on IDE extensions in .gitignore files. We seem to have some back and forth, one cycle

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread Robert Collins
On 1 January 2014 06:07, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: I am not sure if this is the global .gitignore you are thinking of but this is the one I am in favor of: https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files#global-gitignore Maintaining .gitignore in 30+ repositories for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 1 January 2014 06:07, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: I am not sure if this is the global .gitignore you are thinking of but this is the one I am in favor of: