On 15 February 2014 12:21, James E. Blair wrote:
> You won't end up with -1's everywhere, you'll end up with jobs stuck in
> the queue indefinitely, as we saw when the tripleo cloud failed
> recently. What's worse is that now that positive check results are
> required for enqueuing into the gate
On 15 February 2014 09:58, Sean Dague wrote:
>> Lastly, I'm going to propose a merge to infra/config to put our
>> undercloud story (which exercises the seed's ability to deploy via
>> heat with bare metal) as a check experimental job on our dependencies
>> (keystone, glance, nova, neutron) - if
Sean Dague writes:
> On 02/14/2014 03:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Thanks to a massive push this week, both the seed *and* undercloud
>> jobs are now passing on tripleo-gate nodes, but they are not yet
>> voting.
>>
>> I'd kind of like to get them voting on tripleo jobs (check only). We
>> do
