On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Tony Breeds
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see
> > stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way
> > of some
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see
> stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way
> of some logic around proactive backports:
>
Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see
stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way
of some logic around proactive backports:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-since.py@75, and
I see backports proposed for the branch that is no longer
On 2016-12-19 11:29:51 +1100 (+1100), Tony Breeds wrote:
[...]
> Given that we can't just re-run the job and expect success what
> options do we have to publish an 11.0.2 tarball?
>
> I'm assuming this will be a somewhat manual process, given that is
> there anything preventing us from tagging
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:52:30PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-12-16 13:58:58 +1100 (+1100), Tony Breeds wrote:
> [...]
> > Due to a failure in the release pipline [1] some of the release
> > jobs haven't been done.
> [...]
> > [1]
> >
On 2016-12-16 13:58:58 +1100 (+1100), Tony Breeds wrote:
[...]
> Due to a failure in the release pipline [1] some of the release
> jobs haven't been done.
[...]
> [1]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/release-job-failures/2016-December/000324.html
[...]
The failure looks an awful lot like
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>,
> > openstack-infra <openstack-in...@lists.opensta
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:28:46PM -0800, Sumit Naiksatam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
> wrote:
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with
> > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> >
>
>
> Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>,
> openstack-infra <openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls]
> Tagging liberty as EOL
Hi Sumit,
That's fine. That repo wasn't marked for removal.
Cheers,
Josh
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
> wrote:
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
wrote:
> The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with
> a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
>
> Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>,
> > openstack-infra <openstack-in...@lists.opensta
gt; Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>,
> openstack-infra <openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls]
> Tagging liberty as EOL
>
&g
s.openstack.org>,
openstack-infra <openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging
liberty as EOL
> The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been
The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
Cheers,
Josh
[0]
Hey Tony and all,
I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
it I'll look at it then.
Cheers,
Josh
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Tue,
16 matches
Mail list logo