Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see > > stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way > > of some logic around proactive backports: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-since.py@75, and > > I see backports proposed for the branch that is no longer supported > > and has broken gate setup. > > It seems I setup the second wave and then neglected to ask the infra team > to process them. > > Infra tema (*cough* Josh *cough*) can you remove the branches marke Please > EOL in > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4 > ac/raw/4f781426270cb2030f978f47b1f46dae6f5aecb4/liberty_eol_data.txt > > Hey, I have processed these retirements. Let me know if there are any more or any problems etc. Cheers, Josh > Once that's done I can do a final pass for jobs that may break and we can > drop > the devstack, devstack-gate and requirements branches. > > Tony. > > ___ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see > stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way > of some logic around proactive backports: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-since.py@75, and > I see backports proposed for the branch that is no longer supported > and has broken gate setup. It seems I setup the second wave and then neglected to ask the infra team to process them. Infra tema (*cough* Josh *cough*) can you remove the branches marke Please EOL in https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/4f781426270cb2030f978f47b1f46dae6f5aecb4/liberty_eol_data.txt Once that's done I can do a final pass for jobs that may break and we can drop the devstack, devstack-gate and requirements branches. Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way of some logic around proactive backports: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-since.py@75, and I see backports proposed for the branch that is no longer supported and has broken gate setup. Please advise, Ihar On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. > > Cheers, > Josh > > [0] > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh > wrote: >> >> Hey Tony and all, >> >> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get >> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to >> it I'll look at it then. >> >> Cheers, >> Josh >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: >>> >>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th >>> > and Dec >>> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup >>> > zuul/layout.yaml >>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs. >>> >>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that >>> were a >>> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1] >>> >>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at >>> that >>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done >>> later. >>> >>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with >>> something like: >>> >>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt >>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}') >>> >>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable. >>> >>> Yours Tony. >>> >>> [1] >>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt >>> [2] >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh >>> >>> ___ >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >>> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On 2016-12-19 11:29:51 +1100 (+1100), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > Given that we can't just re-run the job and expect success what > options do we have to publish an 11.0.2 tarball? > > I'm assuming this will be a somewhat manual process, given that is > there anything preventing us from tagging glance liberty-eol? The easiest option is to just declare that a missing tarball is acceptable for this last point release. Next easiest is for someone to manually create and upload a tarball to the tarballs site, then perhaps retrigger the signing (and PyPI upload if relevant) jobs for it. Longer term, we need to come up with a solution for this scenario, since clearly the current behavior where tarballs can end up generated on a different platform for release tags than their corresponding branches use is a problem. Some ideas are floating around, but will probably rely on/wait for Zuul v3. -- Jeremy Stanley __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:52:30PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-12-16 13:58:58 +1100 (+1100), Tony Breeds wrote: > [...] > > Due to a failure in the release pipline [1] some of the release > > jobs haven't been done. > [...] > > [1] > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/release-job-failures/2016-December/000324.html > [...] > > The failure looks an awful lot like an incidence of > https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/2750 which suggests this > could be due to Liberty-era cryptography 1.1.2 being incompatible > with libssl 1.0.2g on Ubuntu Xenial. For gate jobs this wouldn't > present a problem because Gerrit tells Zuul what branch a change is > destined for, but with tags there is no such context so we ended up > trying to build that release tarball on Xenial even though we tested > the changes leading up to it for stable/liberty on Trusty. Thanks for the explanation Jeremy. Given that we can't just re-run the job and expect success what options do we have to publish an 11.0.2 tarball? I'm assuming this will be a somewhat manual process, given that is there anything preventing us from tagging glance liberty-eol? Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On 2016-12-16 13:58:58 +1100 (+1100), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > Due to a failure in the release pipline [1] some of the release > jobs haven't been done. [...] > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/release-job-failures/2016-December/000324.html [...] The failure looks an awful lot like an incidence of https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/2750 which suggests this could be due to Liberty-era cryptography 1.1.2 being incompatible with libssl 1.0.2g on Ubuntu Xenial. For gate jobs this wouldn't present a problem because Gerrit tells Zuul what branch a change is destined for, but with tags there is no such context so we ended up trying to build that release tarball on Xenial even though we tested the changes leading up to it for stable/liberty on Trusty. -- Jeremy Stanley __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:02:41PM +1100, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Ian Cordasco > wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Joshua Hesketh > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22 > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List , > > openstack-infra > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] > > Tagging liberty as EOL > > > > > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced > > > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. > > > > > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Josh > > > > > > [0] > > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/ > > 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > > > > Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches > > EOL'd as well. > > > > > Tony's comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410536/ implies there > may be some steps to do first. I'll wait on confirmation from Tony before > retiring the branch. I don't know how to answer that question :( Due to a failure in the release pipline [1] some of the release jobs haven't been done. The point of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410536/ was to make it posisble to generate the docs from liberty with the end-game being an 11.0.2 retagging (or an 11.0.3 release) release that works through the pipeline and generates all the artifacts. Sadly it isn't working as that chnage is failing in the same way as the release-pipeline [2]. So if infra can re-run the indiviual jobs or at the very least drop a glance-11.0.2.tar.gz into tarballs.openstack.org then I think we can retire the liberty branch of glance. If that can't be done then we need to work out what *can* be done Yours Tony. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/release-job-failures/2016-December/000324.html [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108899.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:28:46PM -0800, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh > wrote: > > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with > > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. > > > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. > > Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the > openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_ > removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We > have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in > advance! As Josh pointed out you're not in the list due to the problems we had retiring kilo. I do have a request for you though. Currently your gate (both kilo and liberty) relies on devstack and requirements and probably isn't testing what you thin it is. Can you please update project-config with a gate config that will work on this branches *without* the need to keep liberty (and kilo) alive in those repos. If you need help feel free to reach out. Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Joshua Hesketh > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List , > openstack-infra > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] > Tagging liberty as EOL > > > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced > > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. > > > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. > > > > Cheers, > > Josh > > > > [0] > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/ > 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > > Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches > EOL'd as well. > Tony's comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410536/ implies there may be some steps to do first. I'll wait on confirmation from Tony before retiring the branch. Cheers, Josh > > -- > Ian Cordasco > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Hi Sumit, That's fine. That repo wasn't marked for removal. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh > wrote: > > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced > with > > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. > > > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. > > Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the > openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_ > removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We > have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in > advance! > > ~Sumit. > > > > > Cheers, > > Josh > > > > [0] > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/ > 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh > > > wrote: > >> > >> Hey Tony and all, > >> > >> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't > get > >> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me > to > >> it I'll look at it then. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Josh > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > >>> > >>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov > 28th > >>> > and Dec > >>> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup > >>> > zuul/layout.yaml > >>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs. > >>> > >>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL > that > >>> were a > >>> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1] > >>> > >>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed > at > >>> that > >>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done > >>> later. > >>> > >>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with > >>> something like: > >>> > >>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/ > 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > >>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}') > >>> > >>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable. > >>> > >>> Yours Tony. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4 > ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt > >>> [2] > >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/ > tree/eol_branch.sh > >>> > >>> ___ > >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list > >>> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > >> > >> > > > > > > ___ > > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > > openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_ removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in advance! ~Sumit. > > Cheers, > Josh > > [0] > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh > wrote: >> >> Hey Tony and all, >> >> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get >> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to >> it I'll look at it then. >> >> Cheers, >> Josh >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: >>> >>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th >>> > and Dec >>> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup >>> > zuul/layout.yaml >>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs. >>> >>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that >>> were a >>> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1] >>> >>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at >>> that >>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done >>> later. >>> >>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with >>> something like: >>> >>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt >>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}') >>> >>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable. >>> >>> Yours Tony. >>> >>> [1] >>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt >>> [2] >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh >>> >>> ___ >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >>> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> > > > ___ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Excerpts from Vladyslav Drok's message of 2016-12-14 17:11:56 +0200: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Ian Cordasco > wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Joshua Hesketh > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22 > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List , > > openstack-infra > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] > > Tagging liberty as EOL > > > > > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced > > > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. > > > > > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Josh > > > > > > [0] > > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/ > > 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > > > > Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches > > EOL'd as well. > > > > -- > > Ian Cordasco > > > > Also, after liberty was EOL'd and stable/liberty branches were removed, > liberty release note pages need to be updated to reference liberty-eol tag > instead of origin/stable/liberty, like done here > https://review.openstack.org/410798 as a temporary solution, until this is > fixed on the reno side (https://review.openstack.org/410792), if I get the > situation correctly. > > -Vlad Because the other fix was behind a bunch of the rewrite work I'm doing this cycle, we've set up a stable/newton branch for reno and I have an alternative fix in https://review.openstack.org/410839. When we get that merged, I'll release reno 1.9.0 with the fix. Doug __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Joshua Hesketh > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List , > openstack-infra > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] > Tagging liberty as EOL > > > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced > > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. > > > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. > > > > Cheers, > > Josh > > > > [0] > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/ > 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > > Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches > EOL'd as well. > > -- > Ian Cordasco > Also, after liberty was EOL'd and stable/liberty branches were removed, liberty release note pages need to be updated to reference liberty-eol tag instead of origin/stable/liberty, like done here https://review.openstack.org/410798 as a temporary solution, until this is fixed on the reno side (https://review.openstack.org/410792), if I get the situation correctly. -Vlad > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
-Original Message- From: Joshua Hesketh Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List , openstack-infra Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. > > Cheers, > Josh > > [0] > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches EOL'd as well. -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. Cheers, Josh [0] https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > Hey Tony and all, > > I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get > to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to > it I'll look at it then. > > Cheers, > Josh > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds > wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: >> >> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th >> and Dec >> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup >> zuul/layout.yaml >> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs. >> >> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that >> were a >> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1] >> >> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at >> that >> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done >> later. >> >> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with >> something like: >> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa4 >> 6269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt >> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}') >> >> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable. >> >> Yours Tony. >> >> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0 >> a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt >> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/ >> tree/eol_branch.sh >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> > > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Hey Tony and all, I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to it I'll look at it then. Cheers, Josh On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > > > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th > and Dec > > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup > zuul/layout.yaml > > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs. > > This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that > were a > little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1] > > Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at > that > URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done > later. > > eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with > something like: > URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/ > 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}') > > The data format is a balance between human and machine readable. > > Yours Tony. > > [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4 > ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt > [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/ > tree/eol_branch.sh > > ___ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev