Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Joshua Hesketh]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Tony Breeds 
wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see
> > stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way
> > of some logic around proactive backports:
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-since.py@75, and
> > I see backports proposed for the branch that is no longer supported
> > and has broken gate setup.
>
> It seems I setup the second wave and then neglected to ask the infra team
> to process them.
>
> Infra tema (*cough* Josh *cough*) can you remove the branches marke Please
> EOL in
>
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4
> ac/raw/4f781426270cb2030f978f47b1f46dae6f5aecb4/liberty_eol_data.txt
>
>
Hey,

I have processed these retirements. Let me know if there are any more or
any problems etc.

Cheers,
Josh


> Once that's done I can do a final pass for jobs that may break and we can
> drop
> the devstack, devstack-gate and requirements branches.
>
> Tony.
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Tony Breeds]

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see
> stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way
> of some logic around proactive backports:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-since.py@75, and
> I see backports proposed for the branch that is no longer supported
> and has broken gate setup.

It seems I setup the second wave and then neglected to ask the infra team to 
process them.

Infra tema (*cough* Josh *cough*) can you remove the branches marke Please EOL 
in

https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/4f781426270cb2030f978f47b1f46dae6f5aecb4/liberty_eol_data.txt

Once that's done I can do a final pass for jobs that may break and we can drop
the devstack, devstack-gate and requirements branches.

Tony.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Ihar Hrachyshka]

Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see
stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way
of some logic around proactive backports:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-since.py@75, and
I see backports proposed for the branch that is no longer supported
and has broken gate setup.

Please advise,
Ihar

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
 wrote:
> The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with
> a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
>
> Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> [0]
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Tony and all,
>>
>> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
>> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
>> it I'll look at it then.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Josh
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
>>> > and Dec
>>> > 3rd (UTC+1100).  Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
>>> > zuul/layout.yaml
>>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
>>>
>>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
>>> were a
>>> little problematic during the kilo cycle.  I've updated the list at [1]
>>>
>>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
>>> that
>>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'.  The others will need to be done
>>> later.
>>>
>>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
>>>
>>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
>>>
>>> Yours Tony.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
>>> [2]
>>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>>> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Jeremy Stanley]

On 2016-12-19 11:29:51 +1100 (+1100), Tony Breeds wrote:
[...]
> Given that we can't just re-run the job and expect success what
> options do we have to publish an 11.0.2 tarball?
> 
> I'm assuming this will be a somewhat manual process, given that is
> there anything preventing us from tagging glance liberty-eol?

The easiest option is to just declare that a missing tarball is
acceptable for this last point release. Next easiest is for someone
to manually create and upload a tarball to the tarballs site, then
perhaps retrigger the signing (and PyPI upload if relevant) jobs for
it.

Longer term, we need to come up with a solution for this scenario,
since clearly the current behavior where tarballs can end up
generated on a different platform for release tags than their
corresponding branches use is a problem. Some ideas are floating
around, but will probably rely on/wait for Zuul v3.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Tony Breeds]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:52:30PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-12-16 13:58:58 +1100 (+1100), Tony Breeds wrote:
> [...]
> > Due to a failure in the release pipline [1] some of the release
> > jobs haven't been done.
> [...]
> > [1] 
> > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/release-job-failures/2016-December/000324.html
> [...]
> 
> The failure looks an awful lot like an incidence of
> https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/2750 which suggests this
> could be due to Liberty-era cryptography 1.1.2 being incompatible
> with libssl 1.0.2g on Ubuntu Xenial. For gate jobs this wouldn't
> present a problem because Gerrit tells Zuul what branch a change is
> destined for, but with tags there is no such context so we ended up
> trying to build that release tarball on Xenial even though we tested
> the changes leading up to it for stable/liberty on Trusty.

Thanks for the explanation Jeremy.

Given that we can't just re-run the job and expect success what options do we
have to publish an 11.0.2 tarball?

I'm assuming this will be a somewhat manual process, given that is there
anything preventing us from tagging glance liberty-eol?

Yours Tony.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Jeremy Stanley]

On 2016-12-16 13:58:58 +1100 (+1100), Tony Breeds wrote:
[...]
> Due to a failure in the release pipline [1] some of the release
> jobs haven't been done.
[...]
> [1] 
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/release-job-failures/2016-December/000324.html
[...]

The failure looks an awful lot like an incidence of
https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/2750 which suggests this
could be due to Liberty-era cryptography 1.1.2 being incompatible
with libssl 1.0.2g on Ubuntu Xenial. For gate jobs this wouldn't
present a problem because Gerrit tells Zuul what branch a change is
destined for, but with tags there is no such context so we ended up
trying to build that release tarball on Xenial even though we tested
the changes leading up to it for stable/liberty on Trusty.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Tony Breeds]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:02:41PM +1100, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com>
> > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>,
> > openstack-infra <openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org>
> > Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls]
> > Tagging liberty as EOL
> >
> > > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> > > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Josh
> > >
> > > [0]
> > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> > 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >
> > Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches
> > EOL'd as well.
> >
> 
> 
> Tony's comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410536/ implies there
> may be some steps to do first. I'll wait on confirmation from Tony before
> retiring the branch.

I don't know how to answer that question :(

Due to a failure in the release pipline [1] some of the release jobs haven't
been done.  The point of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410536/ was to make
it posisble to generate the docs from liberty with the end-game being an 11.0.2
retagging (or an 11.0.3 release) release that works through the pipeline and
generates all the artifacts.  Sadly it isn't working as that chnage is failing
in the same way as the release-pipeline [2].

So if infra can re-run the indiviual jobs or at the very least drop a
glance-11.0.2.tar.gz into tarballs.openstack.org then I think we can retire the
liberty branch of glance.

If that can't be done then we need to work out what *can* be done

Yours Tony.

[1] 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/release-job-failures/2016-December/000324.html
[2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108899.html


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Tony Breeds]

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:28:46PM -0800, Sumit Naiksatam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
>  wrote:
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with
> > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> >
> > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
> 
> Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the
> openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_
> removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We
> have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in
> advance!

As Josh pointed out you're not in the list due to the problems we had retiring
kilo.

I do have a request for you though.  Currently your gate (both kilo and
liberty) relies on devstack and requirements and probably isn't testing what
you thin it is.  Can you please update project-config with a gate config that
will work on this branches *without* the need to keep liberty (and kilo) alive
in those repos.

If you need help feel free to reach out.

Yours Tony.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Joshua Hesketh]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com>
> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>,
> openstack-infra <openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls]
> Tagging liberty as EOL
>
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> >
> > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Josh
> >
> > [0]
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>
> Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches
> EOL'd as well.
>


Tony's comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410536/ implies there
may be some steps to do first. I'll wait on confirmation from Tony before
retiring the branch.

Cheers,
Josh



>
> --
> Ian Cordasco
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Joshua Hesketh]

Hi Sumit,

That's fine. That repo wasn't marked for removal.

Cheers,
Josh

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sumit Naiksatam 
wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
>  wrote:
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> with
> > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> >
> > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
>
> Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the
> openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_
> removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We
> have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in
> advance!
>
> ~Sumit.
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Josh
> >
> > [0]
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh  >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Tony and all,
> >>
> >> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't
> get
> >> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me
> to
> >> it I'll look at it then.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Josh
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov
> 28th
> >>> > and Dec
> >>> > 3rd (UTC+1100).  Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
> >>> > zuul/layout.yaml
> >>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
> >>>
> >>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL
> that
> >>> were a
> >>> little problematic during the kilo cycle.  I've updated the list at [1]
> >>>
> >>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed
> at
> >>> that
> >>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'.  The others will need to be done
> >>> later.
> >>>
> >>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
> >>> something like:
> >>>
> >>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
> >>>
> >>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
> >>>
> >>> Yours Tony.
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4
> ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
> >>> [2]
> >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
> tree/eol_branch.sh
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> >>> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> > openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Sumit Naiksatam]

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
 wrote:
> The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with
> a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
>
> Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.

Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the
openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_
removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We
have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in
advance!

~Sumit.

>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> [0]
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Tony and all,
>>
>> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
>> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
>> it I'll look at it then.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Josh
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
>>> > and Dec
>>> > 3rd (UTC+1100).  Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
>>> > zuul/layout.yaml
>>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
>>>
>>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
>>> were a
>>> little problematic during the kilo cycle.  I've updated the list at [1]
>>>
>>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
>>> that
>>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'.  The others will need to be done
>>> later.
>>>
>>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
>>>
>>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
>>>
>>> Yours Tony.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
>>> [2]
>>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>>> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Doug Hellmann]

Excerpts from Vladyslav Drok's message of 2016-12-14 17:11:56 +0200:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com>
> > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>,
> > openstack-infra <openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org>
> > Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls]
> > Tagging liberty as EOL
> >
> > > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> > > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Josh
> > >
> > > [0]
> > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> > 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >
> > Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches
> > EOL'd as well.
> >
> > --
> > Ian Cordasco
> >
> 
> Also, after liberty was EOL'd and stable/liberty branches were removed,
> liberty release note pages need to be updated to reference liberty-eol tag
> instead of origin/stable/liberty, like done here
> https://review.openstack.org/410798 as a temporary solution, until this is
> fixed on the reno side (https://review.openstack.org/410792), if I get the
> situation correctly.
> 
> -Vlad

Because the other fix was behind a bunch of the rewrite work I'm doing
this cycle, we've set up a stable/newton branch for reno and I have an
alternative fix in https://review.openstack.org/410839. When we get that
merged, I'll release reno 1.9.0 with the fix.

Doug

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Vladyslav Drok]

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com>
> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>,
> openstack-infra <openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls]
> Tagging liberty as EOL
>
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> >
> > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Josh
> >
> > [0]
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>
> Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches
> EOL'd as well.
>
> --
> Ian Cordasco
>

Also, after liberty was EOL'd and stable/liberty branches were removed,
liberty release note pages need to be updated to reference liberty-eol tag
instead of origin/stable/liberty, like done here
https://review.openstack.org/410798 as a temporary solution, until this is
fixed on the reno side (https://review.openstack.org/410792), if I get the
situation correctly.

-Vlad


>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Ian Cordasco]

-Original Message-
From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesk...@gmail.com>
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, 
openstack-infra <openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org>
Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging 
liberty as EOL

> The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
>  
> Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
>  
> Cheers,
> Josh
>  
> [0]
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>   

Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches EOL'd 
as well.

--  
Ian Cordasco


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Joshua Hesketh]

The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.

Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.

Cheers,
Josh

[0]
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh 
wrote:

> Hey Tony and all,
>
> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
> it I'll look at it then.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds 
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>
>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
>> and Dec
>> > 3rd (UTC+1100).  Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
>> zuul/layout.yaml
>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
>>
>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
>> were a
>> little problematic during the kilo cycle.  I've updated the list at [1]
>>
>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
>> that
>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'.  The others will need to be done
>> later.
>>
>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
>> something like:
>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa4
>> 6269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
>>
>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
>>
>> Yours Tony.
>>
>> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0
>> a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
>> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
>> tree/eol_branch.sh
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

[Joshua Hesketh]

Hey Tony and all,

I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
it I'll look at it then.

Cheers,
Josh

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds  wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
> and Dec
> > 3rd (UTC+1100).  Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
> zuul/layout.yaml
> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
>
> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
> were a
> little problematic during the kilo cycle.  I've updated the list at [1]
>
> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
> that
> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'.  The others will need to be done
> later.
>
> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
> something like:
> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
>
> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
>
> Yours Tony.
>
> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4
> ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
> tree/eol_branch.sh
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev