Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Neutron] auto configration of local_ip

2014-01-17 Thread balaj...@freescale.com
Hi,

Once we configure Interface of compute node for local_ip, then it can be used 
for both IPv4 and IPv6 as well based on the deployment network.

Regards,
Balaji.P

From: Nir Yechiel [mailto:nyech...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 9:28 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: OpenStack General Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Neutron] auto configration of local_ip



From: Martinx - ジェームズ 
thiagocmarti...@gmail.commailto:thiagocmarti...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: OpenStack General Mailing List 
openst...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openst...@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 5:41:09 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Neutron] auto configration of
local_ip

Guys,

Let me ask something about this...

Apparently, VXLAN can be easier to implement/maintain when using it with IPv6 
(read about it here: 
www.nephos6.com/pdf/OpenStack-on-IPv6.pdfhttp://www.nephos6.com/pdf/OpenStack-on-IPv6.pdf),
 so, I'm wondering if local_ip can be an IPv6 address (for IceHouse-3 / Ubuntu 
14.04) and, of course, if it is better in the end of the day.

Thoughts?!

Cheers!
Thiago

AFAIK the VXLAN draft addresses only IPv4, but IPv6 should be there in the 
future.


On 16 January 2014 12:58, balaj...@freescale.commailto:balaj...@freescale.com 
balaj...@freescale.commailto:balaj...@freescale.com wrote:
 2014/1/16 NOTSU Arata no...@virtualtech.jpmailto:no...@virtualtech.jp:
  The question is, what criteria is appropriate for the purpose. The
 criteria being mentioned so far in the review are:
 
  1. assigned to the interface attached to default gateway 2. being in
  the specified network (CIDR) 3. assigned to the specified interface
 (1 can be considered a special case of 3)
 

 For a certain deployment scenario, local_ip is totally different among
 those nodes, but if we consider local_ip as local_interface, it may
 match most of the nodes. I think it is more convenient to switch from
 ip to interface parameter.

[P Balaji-B37839] We implemented this and using in our test setup. We are glad 
to share this through blue-print/Bug if anybody is interested.

Regards,
Balaji.P


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Neutron] auto configration of local_ip

2014-01-16 Thread balaj...@freescale.com
 2014/1/16 NOTSU Arata no...@virtualtech.jp:
  The question is, what criteria is appropriate for the purpose. The
 criteria being mentioned so far in the review are:
 
  1. assigned to the interface attached to default gateway 2. being in
  the specified network (CIDR) 3. assigned to the specified interface
 (1 can be considered a special case of 3)
 
 
 For a certain deployment scenario, local_ip is totally different among
 those nodes, but if we consider local_ip as local_interface, it may
 match most of the nodes. I think it is more convenient to switch from
 ip to interface parameter.
 
[P Balaji-B37839] We implemented this and using in our test setup. We are glad 
to share this through blue-print/Bug if anybody is interested.

Regards,
Balaji.P


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Neutron] auto configration of local_ip

2014-01-16 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Guys,

Let me ask something about this...

Apparently, VXLAN can be easier to implement/maintain when using it with
IPv6 (read about it here: www.nephos6.com/pdf/OpenStack-on-IPv6.pdf), so,
I'm wondering if local_ip can be an IPv6 address (for IceHouse-3 / Ubuntu
14.04) and, of course, if it is better in the end of the day.

Thoughts?!

Cheers!
Thiago


On 16 January 2014 12:58, balaj...@freescale.com balaj...@freescale.comwrote:

  2014/1/16 NOTSU Arata no...@virtualtech.jp:
   The question is, what criteria is appropriate for the purpose. The
  criteria being mentioned so far in the review are:
  
   1. assigned to the interface attached to default gateway 2. being in
   the specified network (CIDR) 3. assigned to the specified interface
  (1 can be considered a special case of 3)
  
 
  For a certain deployment scenario, local_ip is totally different among
  those nodes, but if we consider local_ip as local_interface, it may
  match most of the nodes. I think it is more convenient to switch from
  ip to interface parameter.
 
 [P Balaji-B37839] We implemented this and using in our test setup. We are
 glad to share this through blue-print/Bug if anybody is interested.

 Regards,
 Balaji.P


 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev