Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Remove `run_tests.sh` and `tools/*`

2016-03-04 Thread Nikhil Komawar
I meant exactly that if you're not using venv for glance testing and want to use testing tools shipped that have the wrappings of run_test or even tox then asking packagers to write new scripts for doing the same thing seems odd. My question still stands: who is still using run_test towards this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Remove `run_tests.sh` and `tools/*`

2016-03-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 04/03/16 14:12 -0500, Nikhil Komawar wrote: Surely you can directly use the standard libraries to test systemwide but I am more curious to know if there are some who are still using run_tests wrappings that exist for to ease the pain a bit. Oh, sorry if I came off wrong. What I meant is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Remove `run_tests.sh` and `tools/*`

2016-03-04 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Surely you can directly use the standard libraries to test systemwide but I am more curious to know if there are some who are still using run_tests wrappings that exist for to ease the pain a bit. On 3/4/16 12:41 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 04/03/16 11:59 -0500, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >> I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Remove `run_tests.sh` and `tools/*`

2016-03-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 04/03/16 11:59 -0500, Nikhil Komawar wrote: I think the hard question to me here is: Do people care about testing code on system installs vs. virtual env? run_tests does that and for some cases when you want to be extra sure about your CICD nodes, packaging and upgrades, the problem is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Remove `run_tests.sh` and `tools/*`

2016-03-04 Thread Nikhil Komawar
I think the hard question to me here is: Do people care about testing code on system installs vs. virtual env? run_tests does that and for some cases when you want to be extra sure about your CICD nodes, packaging and upgrades, the problem is solved. Are packagers using tox to this purpose? On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Remove `run_tests.sh` and `tools/*`

2016-03-04 Thread Ronald Bradford
+1 from me. I am all for standardizing this. Personally when I started looking at OpenStack code as new contributor this was very confusing with the online docs that listed run_tests.sh but the first project I looked at, this didn't exist and it was all tox based. I went on to blog about my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Remove `run_tests.sh` and `tools/*`

2016-03-04 Thread Steve Martinelli
The keystone team did the same during Liberty while we were moving towards using oslo.* projects instead of oslo-incubator [0]. We also noticed that they were rarely used, and we did not go through a deprecation process since these are developer tools. We're still finding a few spots in our docs