Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

rsday, September 27, 2018 12:35 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series On 9/27/2018 2:33 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > If the project plugins were maintained by the OSC project still, maybe there

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

On 9/27/2018 2:33 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: If the project plugins were maintained by the OSC project still, maybe there would be incentive for the various other projects to join the OSC project, scaling things up? Sure, I don't really care about governance. But I also don't really care about

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

27, 2018 12:12 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series On 9/27/2018 10:13 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Monty Taylor writes:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

On 9/27/2018 10:13 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Monty Taylor writes: Main difference is making sure these new deconstructed plugin teams understand the client support lifecycle - which is that we don't drop support for old versions of services i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Monty Taylor writes: >> Main difference is making sure these new deconstructed plugin teams >> understand the client support lifecycle - which is that we don't drop >> support for old versions of services in OSC (or SDK). It's a shift from >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > I definitely think having details about the gaps would be a prerequisite > for approving a goal, but I wonder if that's something 1 person could > even do alone. Is this an area where a small team is needed? Maybe, but it does break down alo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

Monty Taylor writes: > Main difference is making sure these new deconstructed plugin teams > understand the client support lifecycle - which is that we don't drop > support for old versions of services in OSC (or SDK). It's a shift from > the support lifecycle and POV of python-*client, but it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

Dean Troyer writes: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> I started documenting the compute API gaps in OSC last release [1]. It's a >> big gap and needs a lot of work, even for existing CLIs (the cold/live >> migration CLIs in OSC are a mess, and you can't even boot from v

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

First I think that is a great goal, but I want to pick up on Dean's comment: Dean Troyer wrote: [...] The OSC core team is very thin, yes, it seems as though companies don't like to spend money on client-facing things...I'll be in the hall following this thread should anyone want to talk... I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

On 09/26/2018 04:33 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: I started documenting the compute API gaps in OSC last release [1]. It's a big gap and needs a lot of work, even for existing CLIs (the cold/live migration CLIs in OSC are a mess, and you can't eve

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

Oh, very definitely +1000 -- Rochelle Grober Rochelle Grober M: +1-6508889722(preferred) E: rochelle.gro...@huawei.com 2012实验室-硅谷研究所技术规划及合作部 2012 Laboratories-Silicon Valley Technology Planning & Cooperation,Sili

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I started documenting the compute API gaps in OSC last release [1]. It's a > big gap and needs a lot of work, even for existing CLIs (the cold/live > migration CLIs in OSC are a mess, and you can't even boot from volume where > nova creates

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

On 26/09/18 18:55 +, Tim Bell wrote: Doug, Thanks for raising this. I'd like to highlight the goal "Finish moving legacy python-*client CLIs to python-openstackclient" from the etherpad and propose this for a T/U series goal. To give it some context and the motivation: At CERN, we have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

+1 Yes please! -- Mathieu On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 2:56 PM Tim Bell wrote: > > > Doug, > > Thanks for raising this. I'd like to highlight the goal "Finish moving legacy > python-*client CLIs to python-openstackclient" from the etherpad and propose > this for a T/U series goal. > > To give it so