Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Clark Boylan
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017, at 08:23 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > > > On 03/17/2017 09:24 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Sean Dague > > > wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Morales, Victor
ch 17, 2017 at 7:27 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests The patch that reduced the number of Tempest Scenarios we run in e

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Jordan Pittier
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/17/2017 09:24 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Sean Dague > > wrote: > > > > On 03/17/2017 08:27 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > The

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Sean Dague
On 03/17/2017 09:24 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Sean Dague > wrote: > > On 03/17/2017 08:27 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > The patch that reduced the number of Tempest Scenarios we run in every > > job and

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Sean Dague
On 03/17/2017 09:39 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:03 PM Sean Dague > wrote: > > On 03/17/2017 08:27 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > The patch that reduced the number of Tempest Scenarios we run in every > > job and

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Andrea Frittoli
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:03 PM Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/17/2017 08:27 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > The patch that reduced the number of Tempest Scenarios we run in every > > job and also reduce the test run concurrency [0] was merged 13 days ago. > > Since, the situation (i.e

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Jordan Pittier
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/17/2017 08:27 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > The patch that reduced the number of Tempest Scenarios we run in every > > job and also reduce the test run concurrency [0] was merged 13 days ago. > > Since, the situation (i.e

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Sean Dague
On 03/17/2017 08:45 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > I had some patches to collect more stats about mlocks > here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:collect-mlock-stats-in-gate > but they need reviews. Done, sorry I hadn't seen those earlier. -- Sean Dague http://dague.net

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Sean Dague
On 03/17/2017 08:27 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > The patch that reduced the number of Tempest Scenarios we run in every > job and also reduce the test run concurrency [0] was merged 13 days ago. > Since, the situation (i.e the high number of false negative job results) > has not improved

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
I had some patches to collect more stats about mlocks here: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:collect-mlock-stats-in-gate but they need reviews. Ihar On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 5:28 AM Jordan Pittier wrote: > The patch that reduced the number of Tempest Scenarios

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-17 Thread Jordan Pittier
The patch that reduced the number of Tempest Scenarios we run in every job and also reduce the test run concurrency [0] was merged 13 days ago. Since, the situation (i.e the high number of false negative job results) has not improved significantly. We need to keep looking collectively at this.

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-04 Thread Andrea Frittoli
Quick update on this, the change is now merged, so we now have a smaller number of scenario tests running serially after the api test run. We'll monitor gate stability for the next week or so and decide whether further actions are required. Please keep categorizing failures via elastic recheck

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-03 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Thanks. +1. i added my list in ethercalc. Left put scenario tests can be run on periodic and experimental job. IMO on both ( periodic and experimental) to monitor their status periodically as well as on particular patch if we need to. -gmann On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Andrea Frittoli

[openstack-dev] [QA][gate][all] dsvm gate stability and scenario tests

2017-03-02 Thread Andrea Frittoli
Hello folks, we discussed a lot since the PTG about issues with gate stability; we need a stable and reliable gate to ensure smooth progress in Pike. One of the issues that stands out is that most of the times during test runs our test VMs are under heavy load. This can be the common cause