Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Ironic] [Tempest] Problem with paramiko on grenade
On 09/09/2016 02:08 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Dmitry Tantsurwrote: On 09/08/2016 11:24 AM, Anton Arefiev wrote: Hi folks! We've ran into the problem with paramiko, similar to[1] in Inspector. Our grenade job fails on TestNetworkBasicOps.test_network_basic_ops with [2] or [3] in 90% cases. Folks, we're close to the release, and this becomes critical. We don't actually care much about this particular test, it's just imposed on us by the way grenade and tempest are implemented. Is there a way to disable it, so that we can at least release something? We've merged a hack to ironic-inspector to prevent the offending test from running, so it's no longer critical. Still, I'd love to see it fixed properly. Any hints are really appreciated. Looks like reverting fix [4] solves the problem, at least grenade passed few times with reverting patch. But it will back other problems, which mentioned patch fixes. So we need to help with this. Yeah, so far it seems like everything we do about this bit breaks somebody :( I think we should land the revert - the fix at [4] was fixing out of tree code and problems not seen in upstream CI. With the release so close, and inspector's gate dead in the water, I think we should revert it and find a better way to fix the problem folks saw there. I guess the real fix will be part of https://review.openstack.org/367478 // jim Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks in advance. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1615659 [2] http://logs.openstack.org/79/358779/2/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-ironic-inspector/8b5c901/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz#_2016-09-08_08_36_02_408 [3] http://logs.openstack.org/95/352295/9/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-ironic-inspector/b6e3aa7/console.html#_2016-09-08_08_12_20_050120 [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358610/ -- Best regards, Anton Arefiev Mirantis, Inc. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Ironic] [Tempest] Problem with paramiko on grenade
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Dmitry Tantsurwrote: > On 09/08/2016 11:24 AM, Anton Arefiev wrote: >> >> Hi folks! >> >> We've ran into the problem with paramiko, similar to[1] in Inspector. >> Our grenade job fails on TestNetworkBasicOps.test_network_basic_ops with >> [2] or [3] in 90% cases. > > > Folks, we're close to the release, and this becomes critical. We don't > actually care much about this particular test, it's just imposed on us by > the way grenade and tempest are implemented. Is there a way to disable it, > so that we can at least release something? > > Any hints are really appreciated. > >> >> Looks like reverting fix [4] solves the problem, at least grenade passed >> few times with reverting patch. But it will back other problems, which >> mentioned patch fixes. So we need to help with this. > > > Yeah, so far it seems like everything we do about this bit breaks somebody > :( I think we should land the revert - the fix at [4] was fixing out of tree code and problems not seen in upstream CI. With the release so close, and inspector's gate dead in the water, I think we should revert it and find a better way to fix the problem folks saw there. // jim > >> >> Any suggestions are welcome. >> Thanks in advance. >> >> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1615659 >> [2] >> >> http://logs.openstack.org/79/358779/2/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-ironic-inspector/8b5c901/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz#_2016-09-08_08_36_02_408 >> [3] >> >> http://logs.openstack.org/95/352295/9/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-ironic-inspector/b6e3aa7/console.html#_2016-09-08_08_12_20_050120 >> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358610/ >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Anton Arefiev >> Mirantis, Inc. >> >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [Ironic] [Tempest] Problem with paramiko on grenade
On 09/08/2016 11:24 AM, Anton Arefiev wrote: Hi folks! We've ran into the problem with paramiko, similar to[1] in Inspector. Our grenade job fails on TestNetworkBasicOps.test_network_basic_ops with [2] or [3] in 90% cases. Folks, we're close to the release, and this becomes critical. We don't actually care much about this particular test, it's just imposed on us by the way grenade and tempest are implemented. Is there a way to disable it, so that we can at least release something? Any hints are really appreciated. Looks like reverting fix [4] solves the problem, at least grenade passed few times with reverting patch. But it will back other problems, which mentioned patch fixes. So we need to help with this. Yeah, so far it seems like everything we do about this bit breaks somebody :( Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks in advance. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1615659 [2] http://logs.openstack.org/79/358779/2/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-ironic-inspector/8b5c901/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz#_2016-09-08_08_36_02_408 [3] http://logs.openstack.org/95/352295/9/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-ironic-inspector/b6e3aa7/console.html#_2016-09-08_08_12_20_050120 [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358610/ -- Best regards, Anton Arefiev Mirantis, Inc. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev