On 2013/08/10 23:53, Robert Collins wrote:
On 9 October 2013 07:24, Jiří Stránský ji...@redhat.com wrote:
Clint and Monty,
thank you for such good responses. I am new in TripleO team indeed and I was
mostly concerned by the line in the sand. Your responses shed some more
light on the issue for
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 02:31:34PM +0200, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 2013/08/10 13:13, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi
On 8 October 2013 11:59, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
* Example: It doesn't make sense, that someone who is
core-reviewer
Clint and Monty,
thank you for such good responses. I am new in TripleO team indeed and I
was mostly concerned by the line in the sand. Your responses shed some
more light on the issue for me and i hope we'll be heading the right way :)
Thanks
Jiri
On 9 October 2013 07:24, Jiří Stránský ji...@redhat.com wrote:
Clint and Monty,
thank you for such good responses. I am new in TripleO team indeed and I was
mostly concerned by the line in the sand. Your responses shed some more
light on the issue for me and i hope we'll be heading the right
Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
Please see Russell's excellent stats:
Just an fyi, tomas-8c8 on the reviewers list is yours truly. That's
the name I got assigned when I registered to Gerrit and apparently, it
can't be changed.
Thanks for the heads-up, will be doing more reviews.
T.
On 07/10/13 21:03, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi, like most OpenStack projects we
Thanks, will submit a patch to reviewerstats updating it for you.
-Rob
On 8 October 2013 21:14, Tomas Sedovic tsedo...@redhat.com wrote:
Just an fyi, tomas-8c8 on the reviewers list is yours truly. That's the
name I got assigned when I registered to Gerrit and apparently, it can't be
changed.
On 07/10/13 20:03, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
Please see
On 8 October 2013 22:44, Martyn Taylor mtay...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/13 20:03, Robert Collins wrote:
Whilst I can see that deciding on who is Core is a difficult task, I do feel
that creating a competitive environment based on no. reviews will be
detrimental to the project.
I'm not
On 10/08/2013 10:27 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
Perhaps the best thing to do here is to get tuskar-ui to be part of
the horizon program, and utilise it's review team?
This is planned. But it wont happen soon.
On 8 October 2013 19:31, Tzu-Mainn Chen tzuma...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, like most
Hi,
seems like not all people agrees on what should be the 'metric' of a
core reviewer.
Also what justify us to give +1 or +2.
Could it be a topic on today's meeting?
Ladislav
On 10/07/2013 09:03 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up
Hi Robert,
I have few concerns regarding metrics and core-team. To sum up, I think
that there needs to be more metrics and core-reviewers for particular
project (not one group). More details follow:
Measures:
* Only number of reviews shouldn't be the only indicator - you can get
On 2013-10-08 05:03, Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 October 2013 22:44, Martyn Taylor mtay...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/13 20:03, Robert Collins wrote:
Whilst I can see that deciding on who is Core is a difficult task, I
do feel
that creating a competitive environment based on no. reviews
I don't meant to pick on you personally Jiří, but I have singled this
message out because I feel you have captured the objections to Robert's
initial email well.
Excerpts from Jiří Stránský's message of 2013-10-08 04:30:29 -0700:
On 8.10.2013 11:44, Martyn Taylor wrote:
Whilst I can see that
On 10/08/2013 11:22 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
I don't meant to pick on you personally Jiří, but I have singled this
message out because I feel you have captured the objections to Robert's
initial email well.
Darn. My pop-up window showed I don't meant to pick on you personally
so I rushed to go
Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
Please see Russell's excellent stats:
16 matches
Mail list logo
