On 04/15/2014 08:44 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
- it certainly addresses:
- making design work visible
- being able to tell who has had input
- and providing clear feedback to the designers
I'd like to do the same thing fo
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 06:44:28AM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
> I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
> - it certainly addresses:
> - making design work visible
> - being able to tell who has had input
> - and providing clear feedback to the designers
>
> I'd l
On 15/04/14 20:54, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 04/15/2014 01:44 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
- it certainly addresses:
- making design work visible
- being able to tell who has had input
- and providing clear feedback to the design
On 15/04/14 20:44, Robert Collins wrote:
> I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
> - it certainly addresses:
> - making design work visible
> - being able to tell who has had input
> - and providing clear feedback to the designers
>
> I'd like to do the same thin
On 15/04/14 21:54, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 01:44 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
>> - it certainly addresses:
>> - making design work visible
>> - being able to tell who has had input
>> - and providing clear feedback
On 2014/15/04 23:15, James Slagle wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
- it certainly addresses:
- making design work visible
- being able to tell who has had input
- and providing clear feedba
On 16 April 2014 09:15, James Slagle wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Robert Collins
> wrote:
>> I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
>> - it certainly addresses:
>> - making design work visible
>> - being able to tell who has had input
>> - and provid
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
> - it certainly addresses:
> - making design work visible
> - being able to tell who has had input
> - and providing clear feedback to the designers
>
> I'd like to do
+1, I think it's a better medium for conversations than blueprints or wikis.
I'm also +1 to a tripleo-specs repo, but that's less me having a problem
with using incubator and more my OCD.
On 04/15/2014 03:43 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 04/15/2014 11:44 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
I've been watc
On 04/15/2014 01:44 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
- it certainly addresses:
- making design work visible
- being able to tell who has had input
- and providing clear feedback to the designers
I'd like to do the same thing fo
On 04/15/2014 11:44 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
- it certainly addresses:
- making design work visible
- being able to tell who has had input
- and providing clear feedback to the designers
I'd like to do the same thing fo
I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well
- it certainly addresses:
- making design work visible
- being able to tell who has had input
- and providing clear feedback to the designers
I'd like to do the same thing for TripleO this cycle..
I'm thinking we can just ad
12 matches
Mail list logo
