On 12 August 2014 08:35, Zane Bitter wrote:
> This sounds like the same figure I heard at the design summit; did the DB
> call optimisation work that Steve Baker did immediately after that not have
> any effect?
It helped a lot- I'm not sure where heat tops out now - I'm not aware
of rigorous be
On 12/08/14 06:20, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
>> On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
>>> just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming along nicely, but
>>>
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 13:35:44 -0700:
> On 11/08/14 14:49, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-08-11 11:40:07 -0700:
> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11
On 11/08/14 14:49, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-08-11 11:40:07 -0700:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
Right now we're stuck w
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-08-11 11:40:07 -0700:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
> > > On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > > Right now we're stuck with an update that just
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
> > On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
> > > just about update-failure-recovery, which is c
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
> On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
> > just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming along nicely, but
> > it is also about the lack of signals to c
On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming along nicely, but
it is also about the lack of signals to control rebuild, poor support
for addressing machines as groups, and unacceptab
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2014-08-10 15:33:26 -0700:
> On 02/08/14 04:07, Allison Randal wrote:
> > A few of us have been independently experimenting with Ansible as a
> > backend for TripleO, and have just decided to try experimenting
> > together. I've chatted with Robert, and he say
On 02/08/14 04:07, Allison Randal wrote:
> A few of us have been independently experimenting with Ansible as a
> backend for TripleO, and have just decided to try experimenting
> together. I've chatted with Robert, and he says that TripleO was always
> intended to have pluggable backends (CM layer)
10 matches
Mail list logo
