On 22 February 2014 05:36, Derek Higgins wrote:
> the ci cloud seems to be running today as expected, but we have a bit to
> tuning todo
>
> check-tripleo-overcloud-precise is throwing out false negatives because
> the testenv-worker has a timeout that is less then the timeout on the
> jenkins jo
On 21/02/14 03:31, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 18 February 2014 04:30, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> On 17/02/14 01:25, Robert Collins wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories,
>>> *and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because
>>>
On 18 February 2014 04:30, Derek Higgins wrote:
> On 17/02/14 01:25, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories,
>> *and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because
>> we cannot submit to the gate unless jenkins votes
On 17/02/14 01:25, Robert Collins wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories,
> *and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because
> we cannot submit to the gate unless jenkins votes verified... *and* we
> have no redundancy for the trip
Hi!
The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories,
*and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because
we cannot submit to the gate unless jenkins votes verified... *and* we
have no redundancy for the tripleo-ci cloud now, so any glitch in the
current region
