On 06/13/2016 12:10 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 06/13/2016 06:28 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>> On 06/13/2016 09:41 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As we are close to merging the initial Nodes Registration workflows and
>>> action [1, 2] using Mistral which successfully provides the current
On 06/13/2016 06:28 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 06/13/2016 09:41 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
Hi all,
As we are close to merging the initial Nodes Registration workflows and
action [1, 2] using Mistral which successfully provides the current
registration logic via common API, I'd like to start discussio
On 06/13/2016 09:41 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As we are close to merging the initial Nodes Registration workflows and
> action [1, 2] using Mistral which successfully provides the current
> registration logic via common API, I'd like to start discussion on how
> to improve it so it
On 06/13/2016 04:41 PM, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
Hi all,
As we are close to merging the initial Nodes Registration workflows and
action [1, 2] using Mistral which successfully provides the current
registration logic via common API, I'd like to start discussion on how
to improve it so it satisfies GUI
Hi all,
As we are close to merging the initial Nodes Registration workflows and
action [1, 2] using Mistral which successfully provides the current
registration logic via common API, I'd like to start discussion on how
to improve it so it satisfies GUI and CLI requirements. I'd like to try
to
