Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

[Dougal Matthews]

On 22 December 2015 at 11:38, Dougal Matthews  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input.
> As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going into
> Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code is becoming
> more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already).
>
> TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar
> attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2]
>
> Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar,
> python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it
> from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements.
>
> I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January
> if there are no objections.
>

It seems about time to kick this off! So, for anyone that was following
this thread. I have started the process for removing the Tuskar repos with
this review:
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270850/

Followed by these three dependent reviews:
- https://review.openstack.org/270855
- https://review.openstack.org/270854
- https://review.openstack.org/270851

Then finally, dependent on all of the above:
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270869/


> Cheers,
> Dougal
>
>
> [1]:
> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/mitaka/tripleo-overcloud-deployment-library.html
> [2]: https://review.openstack.org/230432
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

[Ryan Brown]

On 12/22/2015 12:44 PM, Jason Rist wrote:

On 12/22/2015 04:38 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote:

Hi all,

I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input.
As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going into
Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code is becoming
more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already).

TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar
attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2]

Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar,
python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it
from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements.

I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January if
there are no objections.

Cheers,
Dougal


[1]:
https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/mitaka/tripleo-overcloud-deployment-library.html
[2]: https://review.openstack.org/230432



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


+1


+1
--
Ryan Brown / Senior Software Engineer, Openstack / Red Hat, Inc.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

[Emilien Macchi]

On 12/22/2015 12:38 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider
> input. As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work
> going into Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code
> is becoming more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already).
> 
> TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar
> attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2]
> 
> Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar,
> python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it
> from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements.
> 
> I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January
> if there are no objections.
> 

By then, I'll proceed to the puppet-tuskar deprecation so we are synced
with upstream.

Please let me know any objection.
-- 
Emilien Macchi



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

[Dougal Matthews]

Hi all,

I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input.
As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going into
Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code is becoming
more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already).

TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar
attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2]

Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar,
python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it
from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements.

I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January if
there are no objections.

Cheers,
Dougal


[1]:
https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/mitaka/tripleo-overcloud-deployment-library.html
[2]: https://review.openstack.org/230432
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

[Jason Rist]

On 12/22/2015 04:38 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input.
> As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going into
> Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code is becoming
> more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already).
> 
> TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar
> attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2]
> 
> Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar,
> python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it
> from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements.
> 
> I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January if
> there are no objections.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dougal
> 
> 
> [1]:
> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/mitaka/tripleo-overcloud-deployment-library.html
> [2]: https://review.openstack.org/230432
> 
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
+1

-- 
Jason E. Rist
Senior Software Engineer
OpenStack Infrastructure Integration
Red Hat, Inc.
openuc: +1.972.707.6408
mobile: +1.720.256.3933
Freenode: jrist
github/twitter: knowncitizen

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

[Ben Nemec]

+1.  I've already proposed a patch to remove it from instack-undercloud
since the last report I got said it doesn't work anyway.

On 12/22/2015 05:38 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider
> input. As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work
> going into Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code
> is becoming more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already).
> 
> TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar
> attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2]
> 
> Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar,
> python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it
> from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements.
> 
> I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January
> if there are no objections.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dougal
> 
> 
> [1]:
> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/mitaka/tripleo-overcloud-deployment-library.html
> [2]: https://review.openstack.org/230432
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Removing the Tuskar repos

[Qasim Sarfraz]

+1

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Jason Rist  wrote:

> On 12/22/2015 04:38 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I mentioned this at the meeting last week, but wanted to get wider input.
> > As far as I can tell from the current activity, there is no work going
> into
> > Tuskar and it isn't being tested with CI. This means the code is becoming
> > more stale quickly and likely wont work soon (if not already).
> >
> > TripleO common is working towards solving the same problems that Tuskar
> > attempted and can be seen as the replacement for Tuskar. [1][2]
> >
> > Are there any objections to it's removal? This would include the tuskar,
> > python-tuskarclient and tuskar-ui repos. We would also need to remove it
> > from instack-undercloud and tripleo-image-elements.
> >
> > I'll start to beginning the cleanup process sometime in min/late January
> if
> > there are no objections.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dougal
> >
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/mitaka/tripleo-overcloud-deployment-library.html
> > [2]: https://review.openstack.org/230432
> >
> >
> >
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> +1
>
> --
> Jason E. Rist
> Senior Software Engineer
> OpenStack Infrastructure Integration
> Red Hat, Inc.
> openuc: +1.972.707.6408
> mobile: +1.720.256.3933
> Freenode: jrist
> github/twitter: knowncitizen
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Regards,
Qasim Sarfraz
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev