Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:57 AM, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: While I cannot speak for the dynamics of the tripleo team, if this were to be adopted in nova I would not +2 any blueprints as I don't

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals

2014-08-19 Thread Robert Collins
Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting. I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak: 19:46:34 lifeless so I propose that +2 on a spec is a commitment to review it over-and-above the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals

2014-08-19 Thread James Slagle
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting. I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak: 19:46:34

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals

2014-08-19 Thread Petr Blaho
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:31:48PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting. I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak: 19:46:34 lifeless so I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals

2014-08-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:31:48PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting. I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak: 19:46:34 lifeless so I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals

2014-08-19 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:31:48PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting. I'd like

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals

2014-08-19 Thread James Slagle
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:31:48PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting. I'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals

2014-08-19 Thread James Slagle
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: While I cannot speak for the dynamics of the tripleo team, if this were to be adopted in nova I would not +2 any blueprints as I don't think I can commit to *guaranteeing* I will have even more review bandwidth, I can