Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-02-15 13:02:36 -0800:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Robert Collins
> wrote:
> > On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> Option B is we make our job easy by strong arming everyone into the same
> >> defaults of our "upstream" c
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince wrote:
>>
>
>> Option B is we make our job easy by strong arming everyone into the same
>> defaults of our "upstream" choosing.
>
> Does Nova strong arm everyone into using kvm? Its the default. Or
>
On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince wrote:
>
> Let me restate the options the way I see it:
>
> Option A is we do our job... by making it possible to install OpenStack using
> various distributions using a set of distro agnostic tools (TripleO).
So our job is to be the upstream installer. If
On 15 February 2014 07:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
> * Reference implementations are always derided as not realistic. I think
> we need to think of a different term. I prefer to just say that this
> is the upstream implementation. We very much expect that a cloud can
> and should operate with th
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Collins"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" ,
> openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:27:20 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in Triple
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-02-13 13:27:20 -0800:
> So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
> we're running into some friction.
>
> I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators
> :)
>
> So far:
> - some packages us
On 14 February 2014 17:57, Jay Dobies wrote:
> I am propably repeating much of what James already said already. But I
>> think an
>> operator that makes the decision to do a package base Triplo installation
>> does
>> so e.g. because he is familiar with the tools and conventions of the
>> specifi
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:27:20AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
we're running into some friction.
I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators :)
So far:
- some packages use different usernam
Hi
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:27:20AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
> So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
> we're running into some friction.
>
> I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators
> :)
>
> So far:
> - some packages use
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
> we're running into some friction.
>
> I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators
> :)
>
> So far:
> - some packages use different use
So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
we're running into some friction.
I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators :)
So far:
- some packages use different usernames
- some put things in different places (and all of them use diff
11 matches
Mail list logo
