This has been actioned. Welcome!
-Rob
On 8 April 2014 11:50, Robert Collins wrote:
> tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> bnemec
> greghaynes
> jdon
>
>
> On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> +1 for your proposed -core changes.
>>
>> Re your question about whether we should
On 08/04/14 02:50, Robert Collins wrote:
> tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> bnemec
> greghaynes
> jdon
>
+1
>
> On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> +1 for your proposed -core changes.
>>
>> Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day
>> ru
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Collins"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 7:50:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] reviewer update march [additional
> cor
On 04/08/2014 02:47 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
On 04/07/2014 07:50 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
I'm comfortable with committing to at least 3 reviews a day and promise
to wield the aw
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 07:50 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> > tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> > bnemec
> > greghaynes
> > jdon
>
> I'm comfortable with committing to at least 3 reviews a day and promise
> to wield the awesome power of +2 responsi
On 04/07/2014 07:50 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
I'm comfortable with committing to at least 3 reviews a day and promise
to wield the awesome power of +2 responsibly. I appreciate being
nominated :)
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jo
On 04/08/2014 01:50 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
+1 to all
Jan
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> bnemec
> greghaynes
> jdob
+1 to all. I've valued the feedback from these individuals as both
fellow reviewers and on my submitted patches.
--
-- James Slagle
--
_
On 08/04/14 00:50, Robert Collins wrote:
> tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> bnemec
> greghaynes
> jdon
+1 for all
>
>
> On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> +1 for your proposed -core changes.
>>
>> Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-d
On 04/08/2014 01:50 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
+1
Imre
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi
+1
Cheers,
--
Chris Jones
> On 8 Apr 2014, at 00:50, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> bnemec
> greghaynes
> jdon
>
>
>> On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> +1 for your proposed -core changes.
>>
>> Re your question about whether we sh
On 2014/03/04 13:02, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with
On 2014/08/04 01:50, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
jdon -> jdob
+1 for all the folks.
-- Jarda
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively
On 8.4.2014 01:50, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
+1
Jirka
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
+1 for the -core changes
jdon sounds like a pretty cool Mafia name, +1 for Don Jay
On 04/08/2014 09:10 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
On 08/04/14 01:50, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
-1, there's a typo in jdob's nick ;-)
In all seriousness, I
On 08/04/14 01:50, Robert Collins wrote:
> tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> bnemec
> greghaynes
> jdon
-1, there's a typo in jdob's nick ;-)
In all seriousness, I support all of them being added to core.
>
>
> On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> +1 for your proposed
+1 for the -core changes
On 04/08/2014 01:50 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
> tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> bnemec
> greghaynes
> jdon
>
>
> On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> +1 for your proposed -core changes.
>>
>> Re your question about whether we should retroactively
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones wrote:
> Hi
>
> +1 for your proposed -core changes.
>
> Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day
> rule to the 3 month review stats, my suggestion would be a qualified
On 04/03/2014 01:02 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-04-03 04:02:20 -0700:
> Getting back in the swing of things...
>
> Hi,
> like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
> date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
> time, and new folk who have been review
On 3.4.2014 13:02, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> Getting back in the swing of things...
>
> Hi,
> like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
> date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
> time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly s
On 04/03/2014 01:02 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
On 03/04/14 14:02, Robert Collins wrote:
> Getting back in the swing of things...
>
> Hi,
> like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
> date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
> time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trus
+1
On 04/03/2014 01:02 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trust
On 03/04/14 12:02, Robert Collins wrote:
> Getting back in the swing of things...
>
> Hi,
> like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
> date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
> time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trus
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day
rule to the 3 month review stats, my suggestion would be a qualified no.
I think we've established an agile approach to the member list of -core, so
if there are a one or two people wh
On 03/04/14 13:02, Robert Collins wrote:
> Getting back in the swing of things...
>
> Hi,
> like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
> date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
> time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trus
On 04/04/14 00:02 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
w
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
In this months revi
30 matches
Mail list logo
