Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] NOT_REGISTERED to be or not to be

2016-08-01 Thread Paul Belanger
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 03:53:12PM +, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote: > Hi, > > Currently in some cases[1] CI sets a comment on the patch set as > NOT_REGISTERED. > > Those comments are very hard to monitor for CI operators and have noisy value > for the developers. > > Maybe a better solution is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] NOT_REGISTERED to be or not to be

2016-08-01 Thread Mikhail Medvedev
Thanks starting the discussion, Lenny. I thought about a way to accomplish that, and came up with few options: - Pre-register all possible jenkins jobs with gearman. This only avoids not registered errors due to gearman server restart, not if you misconfigured your system; - Add option to zuul

[openstack-dev] [all][infra] NOT_REGISTERED to be or not to be

2016-08-01 Thread Lenny Verkhovsky
Hi, Currently in some cases[1] CI sets a comment on the patch set as NOT_REGISTERED. Those comments are very hard to monitor for CI operators and have noisy value for the developers. Maybe a better solution is not commenting in such cases at all as discussed in [2]. If a developer is missing