Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 07:22:15PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > OK, I see. I was assuming we would just tie it to series name, and > that series name could be taken from the .gitreview file or something. > So the URL calculation would always be done locally, and we wouldn't > need any sort of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:33:46PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > this would mean that depends-on does not work anymore - if you update > the upper-constraint file and want to test, you can use depends-on today. > > with uploading to tarballs, this will not work, As Jeremy pointed out this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-04 08:56:17 +1000: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:04:52AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Dmitry

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:04:52AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: > > > > Just to clarify:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On 2017-08-03 18:03, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-08-03 17:33:46 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: > [...] >> this would mean that depends-on does not work anymore - if you update >> the upper-constraint file and want to test, you can use depends-on today. >> >> with uploading to tarballs,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On 2017-08-03 17:33:46 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: [...] > this would mean that depends-on does not work anymore - if you update > the upper-constraint file and want to test, you can use depends-on today. > > with uploading to tarballs, this will not work, I think this is more about the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On 2017-08-03 17:04, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: Just to clarify: we cannot land the tox.ini

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: > > > Just to clarify: we cannot land the tox.ini change until the requirements > > > repo >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 02:51:39AM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: > [...] > > I wonder if we should look at publishing the upper-constraints.txt file > > somewhere (other than cgit). If we did something like: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > I wonder if we should look at publishing the upper-constraints.txt file > somewhere (other than cgit). If we did something like: > > tarballs.o.o/constraints/$series.txt > > We wouldn't have an issue when we EOL a branch and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: > > Just to clarify: we cannot land the tox.ini change until the requirements > > repo > > is actually branched, right? > > Good point. The tests for those

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: > On 07/28/2017 11:13 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > As Thierry mentioned in his countdown email today, the release team has > > now created the stable branches for most deliverables with type > > "library". > > > > We have 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On 07/28/2017 11:13 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: As Thierry mentioned in his countdown email today, the release team has now created the stable branches for most deliverables with type "library". We have 3 exceptions: 1. python-neutronclient had a late release, so I will be branching it

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

Thanks for the reminder, I saw related patches showed up in the Gerrit, will ensure them pass validation jobs. 2017-07-29 5:13 GMT+08:00 Doug Hellmann : > As Thierry mentioned in his countdown email today, the release team has > now created the stable branches for most

[openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

As Thierry mentioned in his countdown email today, the release team has now created the stable branches for most deliverables with type "library". We have 3 exceptions: 1. python-neutronclient had a late release, so I will be branching it shortly. 2. python-barbicanclient was skipped until