Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-18 Thread Lance Bragstad
On 07/18/2017 08:21 AM, Andy McCrae wrote: > > > > The branches have now been retired, thanks to Joshua Hesketh! > > > Thanks Josh, Andreas, Tony, and the rest of the Infra crew for sorting > this out. ++ thanks all! > > Andy > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-18 Thread Andy McCrae
> > > > The branches have now been retired, thanks to Joshua Hesketh! > Thanks Josh, Andreas, Tony, and the rest of the Infra crew for sorting this out. Andy __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-18 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-17 19:09, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-07-17 15:51, Andy McCrae wrote: >> We held back the openstack-ansible repo to allow us to point to the >> mitaka-eol tag for the other role/project repos. >> That's been done - I've created the mitaka-eol tag in the >> openstack-ansible repo,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-17 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 07:09:13PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-07-17 15:51, Andy McCrae wrote: > > We held back the openstack-ansible repo to allow us to point to the > > mitaka-eol tag for the other role/project repos. > > That's been done - I've created the mitaka-eol tag in the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-17 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-17 15:51, Andy McCrae wrote: > We held back the openstack-ansible repo to allow us to point to the > mitaka-eol tag for the other role/project repos. > That's been done - I've created the mitaka-eol tag in the > openstack-ansible repo, can we remove the stable/mitaka branch from >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-17 Thread Andy McCrae
Hi Andreas, OK, added. I'm waiting for packstack confirmation. > > The current list is now: > > > openstack/sahara-extra stable/icehousePlease retire > openstack/sahara-extra stable/mitaka Please retire > openstack/packstack stable/kiloWaiting for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-11 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:33:51AM +, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Will this also be moving to eol - > https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/mitaka/global-requirements.txt? We need to be very careful EOLing that repo (if at all) as project have deep links to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-10 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-10 13:33, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Will this also be moving to eol - > https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/mitaka/global-requirements.txt? No, not planned yet, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-10 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Will this also be moving to eol - https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/mitaka/global-requirements.txt? Thanks Gary On 7/10/17, 9:23 AM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: On 2017-07-07 17:37, Doug Szumski wrote: > >> On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-10 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-07 17:37, Doug Szumski wrote: > >> On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd >>> stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. >>> >>> If there are any mistakes it should be possible to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-07 Thread Doug Szumski
> On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd > > stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. > > > > If there are any mistakes it should be possible to restore the branch > > at the correct

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-06 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > Hi all, > > Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd > stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. > > If there are any mistakes it should be possible to restore the branch at > the correct position. Similarly

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-06 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-07-05 12:13, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > Hi all, > > Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd > stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. > > If there are any mistakes it should be possible to restore the branch at > the correct position. Similarly

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-07-05 Thread Joshua Hesketh
Hi all, Very sorry for the delay on processing this request. I have now EOL'd stable/mitaka branches for projects listed in [1]. If there are any mistakes it should be possible to restore the branch at the correct position. Similarly please let me know if there were any projects that should have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-29 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-29 11:28:10 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > In the meantime we could look at adding permissions such that the Stable > PTL (Well actually I guess eventually it'd be the same bot that does the > release tagging) can push tags and abandon changes on all projects. > > Right now

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-28 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:50:34PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Indeed, that's a bummer. I hadn't noticed it until you pointed it > out and assumed it had made it into the 2.13 series. Well, we're > planning to look at logistics for a 2.14 upgrade soon once 2.13 is > (hopefully!) in production,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-28 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-28 13:21:46 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:59:27PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > Fingers crossed that we'll be able to switch to Gerrit 2.13 soon and > > resume that much needed development effort. > > This looks to have landed in 2.14[1] :( I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-27 Thread Joshua Hesketh
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-17 01:20:28 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > [...] > > I'm happy to help do this if you'd like. Otherwise the script I've > > used for the last few retirements is here: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-27 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:59:27PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Fingers crossed that we'll be able to switch to Gerrit 2.13 soon and > resume that much needed development effort. This looks to have landed in 2.14[1] :( I don't know how hard it'd be to backport to 2.13 or even if that's a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-27 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-17 01:20:28 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: [...] > I'm happy to help do this if you'd like. Otherwise the script I've > used for the last few retirements is here: > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh That would be really appreciated if

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-18 Thread Tony Breeds
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:14:59PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-16 15:12:36 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: > [...] > > It seeems a little odd to be following up so long after I first started > > this thread but can someone on infra please process the EOLs as > > described in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-16 Thread Joshua Hesketh
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-16 15:12:36 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: > [...] > > It seeems a little odd to be following up so long after I first started > > this thread but can someone on infra please process the EOLs as > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-16 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-16 15:12:36 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > It seeems a little odd to be following up so long after I first started > this thread but can someone on infra please process the EOLs as > described in [1]. [...] I thought in prior discussions it had been determined that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-06-15 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:47:25PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > apply the tag. > > I'm proposing to EOL all projects that meet

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-28 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> I'm late in sending this announement, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-24 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: >> Hi all, >> I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several >> projects >> have already requested EOL releases to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-17 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:55:51AM -0400, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > On 4/12/17 2:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several > > projects > > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > > apply the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-17 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > apply the tag. > > I'm proposing to EOL all

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-17 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On 4/12/17 2:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > apply the tag. > > I'm proposing to EOL all projects ... Hi Tony, just wanted to give

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-14 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:58:12PM -0700, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > Hi Tony, > > I’m not the PTL, but I asked in our channel. You can EOL Chef OpenStack as > well. Thanks! Cool. I've added the Chef repos to the EOL list. Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:48:34PM -0700, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > Hi Tony, Kindly do not EOL openstack/group-based-policy, we are > maintaining this branch. Done. Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Samuel Cassiba
Hi Tony, I’m not the PTL, but I asked in our channel. You can EOL Chef OpenStack as well. Thanks! -- Best, Samuel Cassiba signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
Hi Tony, Kindly do not EOL openstack/group-based-policy, we are maintaining this branch. Thanks, ~Sumit. On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:20:50AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> I would not include puppet-midonet without

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:20:50AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > I would not include puppet-midonet without verification from those > devs. I believe it is still in use. Okay I'll leave them in the NOT EOLing list. I assumed that puppet-midonet would just plain fail once there wasn't a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:55:56PM +0100, Andy McCrae wrote: > Can the openstack-ansible repository be skipped until other repo's are > EOL'd, please? The reason is that we'd like the mitaka-eol tag for OSA to > point to the mitaka-eol tag of the appropriate upstream projects, in order > for that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Andy McCrae
Hi Tony, > Please look over both lists by 2017-04-17 00:00 UTC and let me know if: > - A project is in list 1 and *really* *really* wants to opt *OUT* of > EOLing and > why. Note doing this will amost certainly reduce the testing coverage > you > have in the gate. > - A project is in list 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-13 Thread Alex Schultz
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:53:17AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> Please EOL the Puppet OpenStack projects that have the stable/mitaka branch. > > Thanks Alex! I've added: > openstack/puppet-aodh >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:27:22PM +, gordon chung wrote: > i imagine you can EOL python-aodhclient and ceilometermiddleware. thanks Thanks I've added those repos/projects. Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:06:36PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Please add openstack-manuals to the list for EOL, Thanks Added! Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:53:17AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > Please EOL the Puppet OpenStack projects that have the stable/mitaka branch. Thanks Alex! I've added: openstack/puppet-aodh openstack/puppet-ceilometer openstack/puppet-cinder openstack/puppet-designate openstack/puppet-glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread gordon chung
On 12/04/17 02:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Please look over both lists by 2017-04-17 00:00 UTC and let me know if: > - A project is in list 1 and *really* *really* wants to opt *OUT* of EOLing > and > why. Note doing this will amost certainly reduce the testing coverage you > have in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Andreas Jaeger
Please add openstack-manuals to the list for EOL, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Alex Schultz
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi all, > I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects > have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to > apply the tag. > > I'm proposing to EOL all

[openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging mitaka as EOL

2017-04-12 Thread Tony Breeds
Hi all, I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to apply the tag. I'm proposing to EOL all projects that meet one or more of the following criteria: - The project is