n Millnert [mar...@millnert.se]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 2:22 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [dlm] Zookeeper and openjdk, mythbusted
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 10:19 -0500, Adam Young wrote:
> I personally like Java,
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 10:19 -0500, Adam Young wrote:
> I personally like Java, but feel like we should focus on limiting the
> number of languages we need to understand in order to Do OpenStack
> development.
That's a quite useful datapoint to collect in surveys: How many
languages are your comp
Sean Dague wrote:
On 11/09/2015 06:05 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
So that is an important point. While there is "the Oracle JVM", there is
nothing like "OpenJDK". There are a number of OpenJDK builds by various
distros and they are all different (and of varying quality). The beast
is brittle, as
Adam Young wrote:
On 11/09/2015 09:46 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
I do wonder what the cause of varying quality is in the distros. I do
understand that some distros aren't licensing the test suite. But they
are all building from the same upstream.
Except that they all use signi
On 11/09/2015 09:46 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
I do wonder what the cause of varying quality is in the distros. I do
understand that some distros aren't licensing the test suite. But they
are all building from the same upstream.
Except that they all use significant (and differe
Sean Dague wrote:
> I do wonder what the cause of varying quality is in the distros. I do
> understand that some distros aren't licensing the test suite. But they
> are all building from the same upstream.
Except that they all use significant (and different) patchsets on top of
that "same upstream
On 11/09/2015 06:05 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> So that is an important point. While there is "the Oracle JVM", there is
> nothing like "OpenJDK". There are a number of OpenJDK builds by various
> distros and they are all different (and of varying quality). The beast
> is brittle, as anyone who ha
Joshua Harlow wrote:
> [...]
> So in order to dispel this, I tried in that session to say 'actually I
> have heard nothing saying it doesn't work with openjdk' in that session
> but the voices did not seem to hear that (or they were unable to listen
> due to there emotions stressed/high).
As one o
Jeremy,
Yes, i went to re-read that thread :) yes, it was about cassandra NOT zookeeper
http://markmail.org/message/lzsr72cideli5qvt
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2015-11-06 10:55:14 -0800 (-0800), Joshua Harlow wrote:
> [...]
>> Basically here is the TLDR of the que
10:55 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] [dlm] Zookeeper and openjdk, mythbusted
I just wanted to bring this up in its own thread as I know it was a
concern of (some) folks at the DLM session in tokyo[0] and I'd like to
try to
On 2015-11-06 10:55:14 -0800 (-0800), Joshua Harlow wrote:
[...]
> Basically here is the TLDR of the question/complaint:
>
> '''
> Zookeeper, a java application, will force you to install oracles
> virtual machine implementation for it to work, and it doesn't work
> with the openjdk,
[...]
Also,
I just wanted to bring this up in its own thread as I know it was a
concern of (some) folks at the DLM session in tokyo[0] and I'd like to
try to bust this myth using hopefully objective people/users of
zookeeper (besides myself and yahoo, the company I work for) so that
this myth can be put to
12 matches
Mail list logo