On 30 September 2014 14:05, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
I'm poking around now. It looks like pip install -e outside a venv
writes to /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages, which is pure crack
- dist-packages is for the distro, site-packages for pip. Sigh. Also
writing to
On Sep 25, 2014, at 6:14 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 24 September 2014 11:03, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
So... FWIW I think I've got a cleaner implementation of namespaces
*for our context* - it takes inspiration from the PEP-420 discussion
On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 29 August 2014 04:42, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 08/28/2014 12:22 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
...
The problem is that the setuptools implementation of namespace packages
breaks in a way that is repeatable
On 24 September 2014 11:03, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
So... FWIW I think I've got a cleaner implementation of namespaces
*for our context* - it takes inspiration from the PEP-420 discussion
and final design. It all started when Mike reported issues with testr
to me.
On 29 August 2014 04:42, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 08/28/2014 12:22 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
...
The problem is that the setuptools implementation of namespace packages
breaks in a way that is repeatable but difficult to debug when a common
OpenStack installation pattern is used.
On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 29 August 2014 04:42, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 08/28/2014 12:22 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
...
The problem is that the setuptools implementation of namespace packages
breaks in a way that is repeatable
Nuts, thank you.
On 24 September 2014 14:28, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 29 August 2014 04:42, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 08/28/2014 12:22 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
...
The problem is that the
On 08/27/2014 05:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/27/2014 04:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
So this change came in with adding glance.store -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115265/5/lib/glance, which I think is a
bad
On 27/08/14 16:31, Sean Dague wrote:
[snip]
In python 2.7 (using pip) namespaces are a bolt on because of the way
importing modules works. And depending on how you install things in a
namespace will overwrite the base __init__.py for the top level part of
the namespace in such a way that you
On 28/08/14 12:41, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
On 27/08/14 16:31, Sean Dague wrote:
[snip]
In python 2.7 (using pip) namespaces are a bolt on because of the way
importing modules works. And depending on how you install things in a
namespace will overwrite the base __init__.py for the top
On 08/28/2014 12:50 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
On 28/08/14 12:41, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
On 27/08/14 16:31, Sean Dague wrote:
[snip]
In python 2.7 (using pip) namespaces are a bolt on because of the way
importing modules works. And depending on how you install things in a
namespace
On Aug 28, 2014, at 6:41 AM, Radomir Dopieralski openst...@sheep.art.pl wrote:
On 27/08/14 16:31, Sean Dague wrote:
[snip]
In python 2.7 (using pip) namespaces are a bolt on because of the way
importing modules works. And depending on how you install things in a
namespace will overwrite
On 08/28/2014 12:22 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 28, 2014, at 6:41 AM, Radomir Dopieralski openst...@sheep.art.pl
wrote:
On 27/08/14 16:31, Sean Dague wrote:
[snip]
In python 2.7 (using pip) namespaces are a bolt on because of the way
importing modules works. And depending on how
So this change came in with adding glance.store -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115265/5/lib/glance, which I think is a
bad direction to be headed.
Here is the problem when it comes to working with code from git, in
python, that uses namespaces, it's kind of a hack that violates the
principle
On 08/27/2014 09:31 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
So this change came in with adding glance.store -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115265/5/lib/glance, which I think is a
bad direction to be headed.
Here is the problem when it comes to working with code from git, in
python, that uses namespaces,
On 08/27/2014 04:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
So this change came in with adding glance.store -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115265/5/lib/glance, which I think is a
bad direction to be headed.
Here is the problem when it comes to working with code from git, in
python, that uses namespaces,
On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So this change came in with adding glance.store -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115265/5/lib/glance, which I think is a
bad direction to be headed.
Here is the problem when it comes to working with code from git, in
python,
On Aug 27, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/27/2014 04:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
So this change came in with adding glance.store -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115265/5/lib/glance, which I think is a
bad direction to be headed.
Here is the problem when
On Aug 27, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
So this change came in with adding glance.store -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115265/5/lib/glance, which I think is a
bad
On Aug 27, 2014, at 11:55 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So this change came in with adding glance.store -
20 matches
Mail list logo
