Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia)

2017-02-16 Thread Monty Taylor
On 02/16/2017 11:21 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 02/16/2017 08:14 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Andrey Kurilin >> wrote: >>> Yes, I forgot about it. But it changes nothing. >>> Custom implementation of particular service should cover the same API

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia)

2017-02-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/16/2017 08:14 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: Yes, I forgot about it. But it changes nothing. Custom implementation of particular service should cover the same API as an official one. For me, as for user, it doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia)

2017-02-16 Thread Sean Dague
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! > (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia) > >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Radom

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia)

2017-02-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia) > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Radomir Dopieralski > > wrote: > > > I think that you have to remember that OpenStack doesn't on

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia)

2017-02-16 Thread Dean Troyer
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > Yes, I forgot about it. But it changes nothing. > Custom implementation of particular service should cover the same API as an > official one. For me, as for user, it doesn't metter if there is Keystone or >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia)

2017-02-16 Thread Andrey Kurilin
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > I think that you have to remember that OpenStack doesn't only work with > officially approved OpenStack services, but with any services that have a > conforming API. > Yes, I forgot about it. But it changes

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia)

2017-02-16 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
I think that you have to remember that OpenStack doesn't only work with officially approved OpenStack services, but with any services that have a conforming API. OpenStack itself provides implementations of those services, and you are right that it's unlikely that there will be two competing

[openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia)

2017-02-16 Thread Andrey Kurilin
Hi everyone! When I started contribution to OpenStack long time ago, I asked about the reason of having two entities - service type and name; at that time I got an answer that service name is a name of the project that implements particular service type, so it is possible to have several projects