Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Proposal to change integrated neutron grenade gate job to multi-node

2017-07-18 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-07-18 12:05:24 -0700 (-0700), Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > I don't see any issue with it, but it would be great to hear from > infra. They may have their reservations because the change may > somewhat raise pressure on the number of nodes (that being said, there > are some savings too for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Proposal to change integrated neutron grenade gate job to multi-node

2017-07-18 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
I don't see any issue with it, but it would be great to hear from infra. They may have their reservations because the change may somewhat raise pressure on the number of nodes (that being said, there are some savings too for projects that currently run both versions of the job at the same time -

[openstack-dev] [all] Proposal to change integrated neutron grenade gate job to multi-node

2017-07-14 Thread Brian Haley
Hi, While looking at ways to reduce the number of jobs we run in the Neutron gate, I found we ran two very similar jobs for some projects: gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-ubuntu-xenial (single-node job) gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode-ubuntu-xenial (2-node job) We talked about this in the