Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-20 Thread Chris Dent
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016, Anita Kuno wrote: On 03/16/2016 10:45 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: I would like to see it added to openstack-infra so we can properly manage it. I agree with Paul here. purpler (which includes the bot) is now packaged and on pypi: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/purpler

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-19 Thread Paul Belanger
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:55:56PM +, Chris Dent wrote: > > I built an IRC bot > > https://anticdent.org/purple-irc-bot.html > > that provides (see the blog posting): > > * granular logging > * some in channel commands to get recent history and recent mentions > of your nick > *

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-19 Thread Anita Kuno
On 03/16/2016 10:45 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > I would like to see it added to openstack-infra so we can properly > manage it. I agree with Paul here. To that end I have added an item on next week's infra meeting agenda about IRC Bots with the aim of discussing this, as this is not the only bot

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-19 Thread Chris Dent
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-03-16 13:55:56 + (+), Chris Dent wrote: I built an IRC bot https://anticdent.org/purple-irc-bot.html [...] Oof, a gerritbot derivative... at least it's not based on supybot/twisted so doesn't suffer the IPv6+SSL issue we have

[openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-19 Thread Chris Dent
I built an IRC bot https://anticdent.org/purple-irc-bot.html that provides (see the blog posting): * granular logging * some in channel commands to get recent history and recent mentions of your nick * inter channel transclusion of messages and put it on a few channels (openstack-sdks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-19 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-03-16 11:09:12 -0400 (-0400), Paul Belanger wrote: [...] > I know personally, I'd love to see some sort of reminder > functionality added into an IRC bot, which pings me each time > there is some sort of IRC meeting I need to attend. For this, you could just add client highlight matches

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-19 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-03-16 15:44:41 + (+), Chris Dent wrote: [...] > However, I'd really like to avoid having one bot uber alles. > > We should have different bots for different tasks. Microbots or > what have you. [...] Yep, I can get behind that logic. Though having all our official bots use a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-19 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-03-16 13:55:56 + (+), Chris Dent wrote: > > I built an IRC bot > > https://anticdent.org/purple-irc-bot.html [...] Oof, a gerritbot derivative... at least it's not based on supybot/twisted so doesn't suffer the IPv6+SSL issue we have on meetbot and statusbot. Still, I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-19 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 03/16/2016 03:50 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Paul Belanger wrote: > >> So, I cannot comment on the how useful the bot is but if projects are >> in fact >> using it I would like to see it added to openstack-infra so we can >> properly >> manage it. > > I was waiting to see if

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-18 Thread Chris Dent
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Paul Belanger wrote: So, I cannot comment on the how useful the bot is but if projects are in fact using it I would like to see it added to openstack-infra so we can properly manage it. I was waiting to see if there's sufficient interest. The channels that it is already

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

2016-03-18 Thread Paul Belanger
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:50:38PM +, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Paul Belanger wrote: > > >So, I cannot comment on the how useful the bot is but if projects are in fact > >using it I would like to see it added to openstack-infra so we can properly > >manage it. > > I was