l
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:20 AM
> > To: Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com>; OpenStack Development
> Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists
mages-parameters.yaml
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:20 AM
> To: Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com>; OpenStack Development Mailing
> List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org&
oma...@gmail.com>; OpenStack Development Mailing List
(not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] versioning the api-ref?
On 08/18/2016 11:57 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> I guess the intent was to indicate the need for indicating the micr
On 08/18/2016 11:57 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> I guess the intent was to indicate the need for indicating the micro or
> in case of Glance minor version bump when required.
>
> The API isn't drastically different, there are new and old elements as
> shown in the Nova api ref linked.
Right, so
I guess the intent was to indicate the need for indicating the micro or
in case of Glance minor version bump when required.
The API isn't drastically different, there are new and old elements as
shown in the Nova api ref linked.
On 8/12/16 5:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 08/11/2016 06:02 PM,
On 08/12/2016 01:43 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:13 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11 Aug 2016, at 15:02, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>>
>>> I have a question about the api-ref. Right now, for example, the new
>>> images v1/v2 api-refs are accurate for
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:13 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
>
>
> On 11 Aug 2016, at 15:02, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>
>> I have a question about the api-ref. Right now, for example, the new
>> images v1/v2 api-refs are accurate for Mitaka. But DocImpact bugs are
>> being generated as we
On 08/11/2016 06:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> I have a question about the api-ref. Right now, for example, the new
> images v1/v2 api-refs are accurate for Mitaka. But DocImpact bugs are
> being generated as we speak for changes in master that won't be
> available to consumers until Newton is
On 11 Aug 2016, at 15:02, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> I have a question about the api-ref. Right now, for example, the new
> images v1/v2 api-refs are accurate for Mitaka. But DocImpact bugs are
> being generated as we speak for changes in master that won't be
> available to consumers until Newton
I have a question about the api-ref. Right now, for example, the new
images v1/v2 api-refs are accurate for Mitaka. But DocImpact bugs are
being generated as we speak for changes in master that won't be
available to consumers until Newton is released (unless they build from
source). If those bug
10 matches
Mail list logo