Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Sean Dague
On 09/06/2016 11:42 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >> On 2016-09-06 15:36:42 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: >>> On 2016-09-06 15:30, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2016-09-06 15:02, Ihar Hrachyshka

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-09-06 17:42:03 +0200 (+0200), Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: [...] > There are two related but separate questions here: > - is there time when we can drop API from api-ref when it’s removed in code? > - if so, when is it: right when the API is dropped, or when all branches > supporting it are

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Anne Gentle
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Alexander wrote: > > FYI, >> >> A similar discussion was held for an api-ref change in Glance: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356693/ >> > > Thanks for the link, it led me to this

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Alexander wrote: FYI, A similar discussion was held for an api-ref change in Glance: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356693/ Thanks for the link, it led me to this discussion: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/101501.html From

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-09-06 15:36:42 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 2016-09-06 15:30, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 2016-09-06 15:02, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: [...] Since neutron-lib is branched on stable/* boundary, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-09-06 15:36:42 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2016-09-06 15:30, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > >> On 2016-09-06 15:02, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >>> [...] > >>> Since neutron-lib is branched on stable/* boundary, I feel that it would > >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Bashmakov, Alexander
FYI, A similar discussion was held for an api-ref change in Glance: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356693/ On Sep 6, 2016, at 6:39 AM, Andreas Jaeger > wrote: On 2016-09-06 15:30, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Andreas Jaeger >

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2016-09-06 15:30, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> On 2016-09-06 15:02, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >>> [...] >>> Since neutron-lib is branched on stable/* boundary, I feel that it would >>> be fine to keep one-to-one relationship between neutron and neutron-lib

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 2016-09-06 15:02, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: [...] Since neutron-lib is branched on stable/* boundary, I feel that it would be fine to keep one-to-one relationship between neutron and neutron-lib api-ref branches. We only publish the api-ref documents

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2016-09-06 15:02, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > [...] > Since neutron-lib is branched on stable/* boundary, I feel that it would > be fine to keep one-to-one relationship between neutron and neutron-lib > api-ref branches. We only publish the api-ref documents from master, Andreas -- Andreas

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread John Davidge
On 9/6/16, 2:02 PM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote: >Akihiro Motoki wrote: > >> What releases should we support in API references? >> There are several options. >> >> 1. The latest stable release + master >> 2. All supported stable releases + master >> 3. more

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Akihiro Motoki
2016-09-06 22:02 GMT+09:00 Ihar Hrachyshka : > Akihiro Motoki wrote: > >> What releases should we support in API references? >> There are several options. >> >> 1. The latest stable release + master >> 2. All supported stable releases + master >> 3. more

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Akihiro Motoki wrote: What releases should we support in API references? There are several options. 1. The latest stable release + master 2. All supported stable releases + master 3. more older releases too? Option 2 sounds reasonable to me. This question is raised in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
Option 2 sounds reasonable to me too. :) On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > What releases should we support in API references? > There are several options. > > 1. The latest stable release + master > 2. All supported stable releases + master > 3. more

[openstack-dev] [api][doc][neutron] what releases should API reference support?

2016-09-06 Thread Akihiro Motoki
What releases should we support in API references? There are several options. 1. The latest stable release + master 2. All supported stable releases + master 3. more older releases too? Option 2 sounds reasonable to me. This question is raised in the neutron api-ref patch [1]. This patch drops