Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

2017-04-07 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from lebre.adrien's message of 2017-04-07 15:50:05 +0200: > Dear Clint, Dear all, > > It is indeed unfortunate that the WG ends. > > From our side (Inria folks from the Discovery initiative [1]), we had planned > to join the effort after the Boston Summit as we are currently

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

2017-04-07 Thread Joshua Harlow
Sad to see it go, but I understand the reasoning about why. Back to the coal mines :-P -Josh Clint Byrum wrote: I'm going to be blunt. I'm folding the Architecture Working Group immediately following our meeting today at 2000 UTC. We'll be using the time to discuss continuity of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

2017-04-07 Thread lebre . adrien
@fewbar.com> > À: "openstack-dev" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Avril 2017 19:53:17 > Objet: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye.. > > I'm going to be blunt. I'm folding the Architecture Working Group > immed

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

2017-04-07 Thread Thierry Carrez
Clint Byrum wrote: > I'm going to be blunt. I'm folding the Architecture Working Group > immediately following our meeting today at 2000 UTC. We'll be using the > time to discuss continuity of the base-services proposal, and any other > draw-down necessary. After that our meetings will cease. > >

[openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

2017-04-06 Thread Clint Byrum
I'm going to be blunt. I'm folding the Architecture Working Group immediately following our meeting today at 2000 UTC. We'll be using the time to discuss continuity of the base-services proposal, and any other draw-down necessary. After that our meetings will cease. I had high hopes for the