Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re:
[Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed
> that's strange, i tried to see if it's just Ceilometer. the
> periodic-neutron-python27-liberty job seems to be capped appropriately
> to oslo.utils 3.2.0. maybe
On 14/06/2016 12:10 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> I wonder why more projects aren't seeing this in stable/liberty. Perhaps,
> ceilometer stable/liberty isn't using upper-constraints? I think oslo.utils
> 3.2.0
>
g>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re:
[Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed
> i don't know if anyone is looking at this -- i'm not sure where this test is
> even run. i usually
> let mriedem yell at me but i take it he has bigger things on hi
iru...@gmail.com>
Sent: June 13, 2016 10:01:34 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint]
Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed
-Original Message-
From: A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test r
-Original Message-
From: A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test reports.
Reply: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: June 13, 2016 at 01:13:54
To: openstack-stable-ma...@lists.openstack.org