Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed

2016-06-15 Thread Ian Cordasco
Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed > that's strange, i tried to see if it's just Ceilometer. the > periodic-neutron-python27-liberty job seems to be capped appropriately > to oslo.utils 3.2.0. maybe

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed

2016-06-14 Thread gordon chung
On 14/06/2016 12:10 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > I wonder why more projects aren't seeing this in stable/liberty. Perhaps, > ceilometer stable/liberty isn't using upper-constraints? I think oslo.utils > 3.2.0 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed

2016-06-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
g> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed > i don't know if anyone is looking at this -- i'm not sure where this test is > even run. i usually > let mriedem yell at me but i take it he has bigger things on hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed

2016-06-14 Thread gordon chung
iru...@gmail.com> Sent: June 13, 2016 10:01:34 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed -Original Message- From: A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test r

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed

2016-06-13 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test reports. Reply: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: June 13, 2016 at 01:13:54 To: openstack-stable-ma...@lists.openstack.org