Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed
-Original Message- From: gordon chung Reply: gordon chung Date: June 14, 2016 at 21:14:17 To: Ian Cordasco , OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed > that's strange, i tried to see if it's just Ceilometer. the > periodic-neutron-python27-liberty job seems to be capped appropriately > to oslo.utils 3.2.0. maybe it's a dependency? the > periodic-nova-python27-liberty job doesn't seem to have any entries > since March so i can't verify that. So I looked at http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-ceilometer-python27-liberty/3adba17/tox/py27-1.log.txt which comes from the latest stable/liberty periodic job failure: http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-ceilometer-python27-liberty/3adba17/testr_results.html.gz and it if search for oslo.utils it's installing 3.13.0 from requirements.txt. Perhaps something regressed on stable/liberty? -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed
On 14/06/2016 12:10 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > I wonder why more projects aren't seeing this in stable/liberty. Perhaps, > ceilometer stable/liberty isn't using upper-constraints? I think oslo.utils > 3.2.0 > (https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/liberty/upper-constraints.txt#L202) > is low enough to avoid this if you're using constraints. (It looks as if the > total_seconds removal was first released in 3.12.0 > https://github.com/openstack/oslo.utils/commit/8f5e65cae3aaf8d0a89d16d8932c266151de44f7) > that's strange, i tried to see if it's just Ceilometer. the periodic-neutron-python27-liberty job seems to be capped appropriately to oslo.utils 3.2.0. maybe it's a dependency? the periodic-nova-python27-liberty job doesn't seem to have any entries since March so i can't verify that. cheers, -- gord __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed
-Original Message- From: gordon chung Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: June 14, 2016 at 06:51:08 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed > i don't know if anyone is looking at this -- i'm not sure where this test is > even run. i usually > let mriedem yell at me but i take it he has bigger things on his plate now :) Heh, I just looked through these quickly yesterday. I suspect Matt would have worked his way around to these. > this seems like a pretty simple fix from the error output[1]. i guess my > question is: should > the correct fix be to cap oslo.utils? based on the error, the issue seems to > be total_seconds > method was removed. this was deprecated in Mitaka[2], so i don't think it > should've been > removed from Liberty. as this is an easy fix, i'm pretty indifferent if we > decide to fix > this rather than slow down progress. the original purpose of this method > (based on commit > messsage) seems to be related to py2.6. i don't know if this is still an > issue. I wonder why more projects aren't seeing this in stable/liberty. Perhaps, ceilometer stable/liberty isn't using upper-constraints? I think oslo.utils 3.2.0 (https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/stable/liberty/upper-constraints.txt#L202) is low enough to avoid this if you're using constraints. (It looks as if the total_seconds removal was first released in 3.12.0 https://github.com/openstack/oslo.utils/commit/8f5e65cae3aaf8d0a89d16d8932c266151de44f7) I'll let soemone else determine if the right answer is capping stable/liberty. Cheers, -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed
i don't know if anyone is looking at this -- i'm not sure where this test is even run. i usually let mriedem yell at me but i take it he has bigger things on his plate now :) this seems like a pretty simple fix from the error output[1]. i guess my question is: should the correct fix be to cap oslo.utils? based on the error, the issue seems to be total_seconds method was removed. this was deprecated in Mitaka[2], so i don't think it should've been removed from Liberty. as this is an easy fix, i'm pretty indifferent if we decide to fix this rather than slow down progress. the original purpose of this method (based on commit messsage) seems to be related to py2.6. i don't know if this is still an issue. [1] http://paste.openstack.org/show/515960/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248590/ cheers, -- gord From: Ian Cordasco Sent: June 13, 2016 10:01:34 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed -Original Message- From: A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test reports. Reply: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: June 13, 2016 at 01:13:54 To: openstack-stable-ma...@lists.openstack.org Subject: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed > Build failed. > > - periodic-ceilometer-docs-liberty > http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-ceilometer-docs-liberty/204fcec/ > : SUCCESS in 5m 31s > - periodic-ceilometer-python27-liberty > http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-ceilometer-python27-liberty/00f7474/ > : FAILURE in 6m 20s Hey ceilometer stable maintainers, The following tests have been failing in periodic jobs for the last 4 days: ceilometer.tests.unit.alarm.evaluator.test_base.TestEvaluatorBaseClass - test_base_time_constraints_by_month - test_base_time_constraints_complex - test_base_time_constraints - test_base_time_constraints_timezone ceilometer.tests.unit.alarm.evaluator.test_combination.TestEvaluate - test_no_state_change_outside_time_constraint - test_state_change_inside_time_constraint ceilometer.tests.unit.alarm.evaluator.test_gnocchi.TestGnocchiThresholdEvaluate - test_no_state_change_outside_time_constraint ceilometer.tests.unit.alarm.evaluator.test_threshold.TestEvaluate - test_no_state_change_outside_time_constraint - test_state_change_inside_time_constraint And this one has been failing every day for almost a week now (starting on 7 June 2016) ceilometer.tests.unit.test_messaging.MessagingTests.test_get_transport_optional Is anyone looking into these? -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [stable] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed
-Original Message- From: A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test reports. Reply: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: June 13, 2016 at 01:13:54 To: openstack-stable-ma...@lists.openstack.org Subject: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed > Build failed. > > - periodic-ceilometer-docs-liberty > http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-ceilometer-docs-liberty/204fcec/ > : SUCCESS in 5m 31s > - periodic-ceilometer-python27-liberty > http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-ceilometer-python27-liberty/00f7474/ > : FAILURE in 6m 20s Hey ceilometer stable maintainers, The following tests have been failing in periodic jobs for the last 4 days: ceilometer.tests.unit.alarm.evaluator.test_base.TestEvaluatorBaseClass - test_base_time_constraints_by_month - test_base_time_constraints_complex - test_base_time_constraints - test_base_time_constraints_timezone ceilometer.tests.unit.alarm.evaluator.test_combination.TestEvaluate - test_no_state_change_outside_time_constraint - test_state_change_inside_time_constraint ceilometer.tests.unit.alarm.evaluator.test_gnocchi.TestGnocchiThresholdEvaluate - test_no_state_change_outside_time_constraint ceilometer.tests.unit.alarm.evaluator.test_threshold.TestEvaluate - test_no_state_change_outside_time_constraint - test_state_change_inside_time_constraint And this one has been failing every day for almost a week now (starting on 7 June 2016) ceilometer.tests.unit.test_messaging.MessagingTests.test_get_transport_optional Is anyone looking into these? -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
