The recent split of the unit and functional tests in ceilometer shows some interesting test coverage data. With just what are now called the "unit tests" coverage is a meek 58%. With both the unit and functional (what used to be the standard coverage run) the coverage is a still kind of meek 84%.
Do we have, or do we want to have, a particular coverage target for the code. Or if not all the code then at least some sections of it? Do we want that metric of coverage to be against just the unit tests or unit and functional? Note that these numbers are thrown off quite a bit by various artifacts like database migration files so are not a super accurate overview of true test coverage, just a (potentially) useful indicator. -- Chris Dent tw:@anticdent freenode:cdent https://tank.peermore.com/tanks/cdent __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev