Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
On 2017-12-18 10:28 AM, Jaze Lee wrote: > Is there some document about how to use rate? I do not find any about it > Thanks. > https://gnocchi.xyz/rest.html#archive-policy its' similar to how other aggregates are defined. it's just not part of default aggregation methods. -- gord __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
2017-12-18 21:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : > > > On 2017-12-17 11:08 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: >> Hello. >> >> 2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee : >>> 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: > It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's > work? > If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily. it already exists in gnocchi 4.1+. we just need to change the workflow in ceilometer so it integrates with gnocchi. >>> Oh, I do not quite understand, can you give more details? >>> I do not know change which part of workflow in ceilometer. >>> > > i don't openstack on weekends. Sorry... > > what needs to change is that rate aggregate needs to be enabled for > specific meters such as cpu. this will effectively calculate the cputime > per second. then you apply the same maths on timeseries that transformer > does when you query gnocchi. Is there some document about how to use rate? I do not find any about it Thanks. > > -- > gord > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- 谦谦君子 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
On 2017-12-17 11:08 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: > Hello. > > 2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee : >> 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : >>> >>> >>> On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's work? If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily. >>> >>> it already exists in gnocchi 4.1+. we just need to change the workflow >>> in ceilometer so it integrates with gnocchi. >> Oh, I do not quite understand, can you give more details? >> I do not know change which part of workflow in ceilometer. >> i don't openstack on weekends. what needs to change is that rate aggregate needs to be enabled for specific meters such as cpu. this will effectively calculate the cputime per second. then you apply the same maths on timeseries that transformer does when you query gnocchi. -- gord __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
Hello. 2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee : > 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : >> >> >> On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: >>> It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's >>> work? >>> If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily. >> >> it already exists in gnocchi 4.1+. we just need to change the workflow >> in ceilometer so it integrates with gnocchi. > Oh, I do not quite understand, can you give more details? > I do not know change which part of workflow in ceilometer. > > >> >> >> -- >> gord >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > -- > 谦谦君子 -- 谦谦君子 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : > > > On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: >> It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's work? >> If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily. > > it already exists in gnocchi 4.1+. we just need to change the workflow > in ceilometer so it integrates with gnocchi. Oh, I do not quite understand, can you give more details? I do not know change which part of workflow in ceilometer. > > > -- > gord > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- 谦谦君子 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: > It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's work? > If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily. it already exists in gnocchi 4.1+. we just need to change the workflow in ceilometer so it integrates with gnocchi. -- gord __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
2017-12-14 22:34 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : > > > On 2017-12-14 04:14 AM, Jaze Lee wrote: >>> The plan is to actually make the TSDB (Gnocchi) do that job for us. >> What ？ >> Is there some detail on this plan ? If it did, then we do not need >> workload partition, and scale with agent process happily >> > > Gnocchi can capture rate information and can also have mathematical > operations applied to it. there are some examples here: > https://gnocchi.xyz/rest.html#examples. i imagine we'll change the gate > workflow to that eventually. It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's work? If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily. > > you will still need partitioning for HA of central agents... and > currently, the only way to get batch support is with workload_partitioning. > > but yes, moving the transformation to storage will provide the most > durable solution for transformations. > > cheers, > > -- > gord > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- 谦谦君子 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
On 2017-12-14 04:14 AM, Jaze Lee wrote: >> The plan is to actually make the TSDB (Gnocchi) do that job for us. > What ？ > Is there some detail on this plan ? If it did, then we do not need > workload partition, and scale with agent process happily > Gnocchi can capture rate information and can also have mathematical operations applied to it. there are some examples here: https://gnocchi.xyz/rest.html#examples. i imagine we'll change the gate workflow to that eventually. you will still need partitioning for HA of central agents... and currently, the only way to get batch support is with workload_partitioning. but yes, moving the transformation to storage will provide the most durable solution for transformations. cheers, -- gord __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
2017-12-14 16:58 GMT+08:00 Julien Danjou : > On Thu, Dec 14 2017, Jaze Lee wrote: > >> Oh, sorry. I found libvirt can not get cpu.util, cpu.delta, and >> network/disk rate info directly >> from inspector. So i mean, we can move this into compute pollster. >> Before it sends to notifications.sample, >> transform it. Then we can scale notification agent and do not have >> flapping sample problems > > The plan is to actually make the TSDB (Gnocchi) do that job for us. What ？ Is there some detail on this plan ? If it did, then we do not need workload partition, and scale with agent process happily > > -- > Julien Danjou > /* Free Software hacker >https://julien.danjou.info */ -- 谦谦君子 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
On Thu, Dec 14 2017, Jaze Lee wrote: > Oh, sorry. I found libvirt can not get cpu.util, cpu.delta, and > network/disk rate info directly > from inspector. So i mean, we can move this into compute pollster. > Before it sends to notifications.sample, > transform it. Then we can scale notification agent and do not have > flapping sample problems The plan is to actually make the TSDB (Gnocchi) do that job for us. -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker https://julien.danjou.info */ signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
2017-12-13 21:16 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : > > > On 2017-12-13 01:52 AM, Jaze Lee wrote: >> Hello, >> >> What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we >> do not need >> transformer any more > > sorry, i don't understand. if you move the transformer, you still have a > transformer. Oh, sorry. I found libvirt can not get cpu.util, cpu.delta, and network/disk rate info directly from inspector. So i mean, we can move this into compute pollster. Before it sends to notifications.sample, transform it. Then we can scale notification agent and do not have flapping sample problems > > > -- > gord > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- 谦谦君子 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
On 2017-12-13 01:52 AM, Jaze Lee wrote: > Hello, > > What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we > do not need > transformer any more sorry, i don't understand. if you move the transformer, you still have a transformer. -- gord __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt
Hello, What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we do not need transformer any more -- 谦谦君子 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
