t for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance] Update volume-image-metadata
> proposal
>
> On 25 June 2014 20:08, Tripp, Travis S wrote:
>
>> Once an instance is launched, the “image” properties are treated the
>> same and lose distinction of whether t
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance] Update volume-image-metadata
proposal
On 25 June 2014 20:08, Tripp, Travis S wrote:
> Once an instance is launched, the “image” properties are treated the
> same and lose distinction of whether they came from an image or a
>
On 25 June 2014 20:08, Tripp, Travis S wrote:
> Once an instance is launched, the “image” properties are treated the same
> and lose distinction of whether they came from an image or a bootable volume
> in Nova. I agree with Facundo that maintaining a consistency between
> configuration files sou
ng List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance] Update volume-image-metadata
proposal
Thanks for the response, I'll be there this Thursday.
Having the file in more than one place could me a nightmare if we have to
maintain consistency between them.
It
rosma...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:10 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance] Update volume-image-metadata
proposal
Hi Facundo,
Can you attend the Glance meeting this week at 20:00 UTC on Thursd
From: Maldonado, Facundo N [facundo.n.maldon...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 2:34 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance] Update volume-image-metadata proposal
Hi folks,
I started working on th
Hi folks,
I started working on this blueprint [1] but the work to be done
is not limited to cinder python client.
Volume-image-metadata is immutable in Cinder and Glance has
RBAC image properties and it doesn't provide any way to find out which are
those protecte
