Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Testing Cinder upgrades - c-bak upgrade

2016-01-30 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 29 Jan 2016 19:37, "Michał Dulko" wrote: > > Resolution on this matter from the Cinder mid-cycle is that we're fine > as long as we safely fail in case of upgrade conducted in an improper > order. And it seems we can implement that in a simple way by raising an >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Testing Cinder upgrades - c-bak upgrade

2016-01-29 Thread Michał Dulko
On 01/20/2016 09:11 PM, Li, Xiaoyan wrote: > @ DuncanT and @dule: > > I noticed from IRC log that you are discussing about c-bak upgrade, and I am > working on this, please see following message. Hope I don't miss anything. > > As you know, currently c-bak and c-vol are in same nodes. c-bak

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Testing Cinder upgrades - c-bak upgrade

2016-01-20 Thread Li, Xiaoyan
@ DuncanT and @dule: I noticed from IRC log that you are discussing about c-bak upgrade, and I am working on this, please see following message. Hope I don't miss anything. As you know, currently c-bak and c-vol are in same nodes. c-bak depends on c-vol service. But it is not necessary that