On Wednesday 26 March 2014 13:49:48 Julie Pichon wrote:
> On 26/03/14 12:14, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > there's been a review up for some time [0] that wants to raise the version
> > of lesscpy to 0.10.1. It's specific to horizon and contains some
> > important fixes that we'll likely
On 26/03/14 12:14, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there's been a review up for some time [0] that wants to raise the version of
> lesscpy to 0.10.1. It's specific to horizon and contains some important fixes
> that we'll likely want to include. So I'd like to ask for an exception for
> this o
It's not expected that you are installing all of openstack into venvs,
it's expected that it works at a system level.
That's always been a design point given that Linux distributions
actually want to ship all this stuff.
-Sean
On 03/26/2014 08:28 AM, Adam Nelson wrote:
> I'm not sure why
Hi,
Could you possibly add whats new in the changelog as well?
Thanks
chuck
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there's been a review up for some time [0] that wants to raise the version
> of
> lesscpy to 0.10.1. It's specific to horizon and contains some importan
I'm not sure why there's so much resistance to Python package version
minimums being increased. Everybody should be using virtualenvs anyway so
it's not like there's some sort of need to support old libraries because
that's what's on deployed OSes.
I understand supporting old kernels, system libr
Hi,
there's been a review up for some time [0] that wants to raise the version of
lesscpy to 0.10.1. It's specific to horizon and contains some important fixes
that we'll likely want to include. So I'd like to ask for an exception for
this one.
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70619/
--
V
