Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] - suggested development workflow without ./rejoin-stack.sh ?

2016-05-03 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 03:10:56PM -0700, Kevin Benton wrote: > This patch removed the ./rejoin-stack.sh script: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291453/ > > I relied on this heavily in my development VM which sees lots of restarts > because of various things (VM becomes unresponsive in load

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] - suggested development workflow without ./rejoin-stack.sh ?

2016-05-03 Thread Dean Troyer
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Now am I correct in understanding that when this happens there is no way > to restart the services in a simple manner without blowing away everything > and starting over? Unless I'm missing some way to run ./stack.sh without

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] - suggested development workflow without ./rejoin-stack.sh ?

2016-05-02 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Honestly those kind of major changes have to be discussed very carefully. On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > This patch removed the ./rejoin-stack.sh script: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291453/ > > I relied on this heavily in my development VM which

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] - suggested development workflow without ./rejoin-stack.sh ?

2016-05-02 Thread Timothy Symanczyk
lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [devstack] - suggested development workflow without ./rejoin-stack.sh ? This patch removed the ./rejoin-stack.sh script: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291453/ I relied on this heavily in my development VM which sees lots of restarts because of vari

[openstack-dev] [devstack] - suggested development workflow without ./rejoin-stack.sh ?

2016-05-02 Thread Kevin Benton
This patch removed the ./rejoin-stack.sh script: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291453/ I relied on this heavily in my development VM which sees lots of restarts because of various things (VM becomes unresponsive in load testing, my laptop has a kernel panic, etc). Normally this was not a big