On 03/21/2017 03:10 AM, Mikhail Medvedev wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andre Florath wrote:
Submitted the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/diskimage-builder/+bug/1674402
Thanks; some updates there.
Would adding a third-party CI job help? I can put together a
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andre Florath wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Thanks for the bug report. Can you please file this as a bug?
Hi Andre,
Submitted the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/diskimage-builder/+bug/1674402
>
> There is a very high probability that I introduced a
Hello!
Thanks for the bug report. Can you please file this as a bug?
There is a very high probability that I introduced a change that
leads to the failure [1] - even if this is fixed now there is a
high probability that it will fail again when [2] is merged.
The reason is, that there are no
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
> Hi
>
> diskimage-builder has been working on a feature/v2 branch
> incorporating some largely internal changes to the way it finds and
> calls elements, enhancements to partitioning and removal of some
> long-deprecated
Hello Ian,
I think I found a regression: since [1] only the first
package specified using '-p' is picked up.
You can find a proposal for a fix under [2].
Maybe it's worth to include this in V2?
Kind regards
Andre
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396702
[2]
Hi
diskimage-builder has been working on a feature/v2 branch
incorporating some largely internal changes to the way it finds and
calls elements, enhancements to partitioning and removal of some
long-deprecated elements. We have just tagged 2.0.0rc1 and are
requesting testing by interested