Re: [openstack-dev] [diskimage-builder] Does anyone use "fedora" target?

2017-08-29 Thread Matthew Thode
On 17-08-29 17:21:00, Ian Wienand wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The "fedora" element -- the one that downloads the upstream .qcow2 and
> re-packages it -- is currently broken as the links we use have
> disappeared [1].  Even allowing for this, it's still broken with some
> changes to the kernel install scripts [2].  AFAICT, the only thing
> noticing this is our CI.
> 
> fedora-minimal takes a different approach of building the system
> within a blank chroot.  It's what we use to create the upstream
> images.
> 
> I believe the octavia jobs switched to fedora-minimal?
> 
> Is there anyone still using these image-based jobs?  Is there any
> reason why you can't use fedora-minimal?  I don't really see this as
> being that useful, and our best path forward might be just to retire
> it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -i
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/497734
> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/diskimage-builder/+bug/1713381
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

We use it downstream to build ironic images using the process kevin
documented here.  
https://cloudnull.io/2016/11/osic-building-baremetal-ironic-images/

It can probably be updated but it'd be nice for it to not disapear out
from under us.

-- 
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [diskimage-builder] Does anyone use "fedora" target?

2017-08-29 Thread Ian Wienand

Hi,

The "fedora" element -- the one that downloads the upstream .qcow2 and
re-packages it -- is currently broken as the links we use have
disappeared [1].  Even allowing for this, it's still broken with some
changes to the kernel install scripts [2].  AFAICT, the only thing
noticing this is our CI.

fedora-minimal takes a different approach of building the system
within a blank chroot.  It's what we use to create the upstream
images.

I believe the octavia jobs switched to fedora-minimal?

Is there anyone still using these image-based jobs?  Is there any
reason why you can't use fedora-minimal?  I don't really see this as
being that useful, and our best path forward might be just to retire
it.

Thanks,

-i

[1] https://review.openstack.org/497734
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/diskimage-builder/+bug/1713381

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev