Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-04-15 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Jeremy, thank you, that's excellent news. The Infra team is doing awesome work to improve the processes in all possible ways. Andreas, I will take a closer look, but it seems to be exactly what I had in mind. Thanks for sharing! -- Best regards, Oleg Gelbukh On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:29 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-04-15 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 04/14/2016 06:30 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-04-14 12:57:38 +0300 (+0300), Oleg Gelbukh wrote: The thread I'm referring to in the prev message is: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-January/000624.html At this point it's probably no longer a concern. We don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-04-14 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-04-14 12:57:38 +0300 (+0300), Oleg Gelbukh wrote: > The thread I'm referring to in the prev message is: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-January/000624.html At this point it's probably no longer a concern. We don't (and haven't for some time) really support pip

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-04-14 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
The thread I'm referring to in the prev message is: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-January/000624.html -- Best regards, Oleg Gelbukh Mirantis Inc. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Oleg Gelbukh wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sorry for replying to this

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-04-14 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Hi, I'm sorry for replying to this old thread, but I would really like to see this moving. There's a 'pre-release' pipeline in Zuul which serves exactly that purpose: handle pre-release tags (beta-versions). However, per this thread, it is not recommended due to possible issues with pip unable

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-01-21 Thread Yuriy Taraday
By the way, it would be very helpful for testing external tools if we had 7.0.1 release on PyPI as well. It seems python-fuelclient somehow ended up with a "stable/7.0.1" branch instead of "7.0.1" tag. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:49 PM Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > Releasing a

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-01-20 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Releasing a beta version sounds like a good plan but does OpenStack Infra actually support this? > 20 січ. 2016 р. о 12:05 Oleg Gelbukh написав(ла): > > Hi, > > Currently we're experiencing issues with Python dependencies of our package > (fuel-octane), specifically

[openstack-dev] [fuel] [fuelclient] Pre-release versions of fuelclient for testing purposes

2016-01-20 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Hi, Currently we're experiencing issues with Python dependencies of our package (fuel-octane), specifically between fuelclient's dependencies and keystoneclient dependencies. New keystoneclient is required to work with the new version of Nailgun due to introduction of SSL in the latter. On the