Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] release version numbers: let's use semvers
The only thing I would like to mention here is that scripts for making automatic releases on PyPi using OpenStack Infra won’t work, if the version is not formatted according to semver. - romcheg > 24 трав. 2016 р. о 14:34 Igor Kalnitskyнаписав(ла): > > Hey Zigo, > > In Python community there's a PEP-440 [1] that defines a versioning scheme. > The thing you should know is, the PEP __is not__ compatible with semver, and > it's totally fine to have two components version. > > So I don't think we should force version changes from two-components to > three-components scheme, since it won't be compatible with semver anyway. > > Thanks, > Igor > > [1]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/ > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] release version numbers: let's use semvers
Hey Zigo, In Python community there's a PEP-440 [1] that defines a versioning scheme. The thing you should know is, the PEP __is not__ compatible with semver, and it's totally fine to have two components version. So I don't think we should force version changes from two-components to three-components scheme, since it won't be compatible with semver anyway. Thanks, Igor [1]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [fuel] release version numbers: let's use semvers
Hi, A number of Fuel components were previously tagged as "9.0". This isn't compatible with the semver scheme. Could we agree to switch to x.y.z going forward? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev