Update:
The discussion went in two directions:
(1) Whether supporting OS tarballs in Ironic is a good idea ... continuing
discussion on the Ironic spec, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248968/
(2) How an OS tarball should be identified in Glance ... continuing
discussion on the Glance spec-lite
Hi Flavio,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> [snip]
> However, as a community, I think we should send a clear message and protect
> our users and, in this case, the best way
> is to avoid adding this format as supported.
>
To address some of the concerns i have added a se
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:32:58AM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 27/01/16 08:20 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> >On 26/01/16 09:11 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:00:16AM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote:
> >>>I guess my wisdom would be 'why'? What does this enable you
On 27/01/16 08:20 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 26/01/16 09:11 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:00:16AM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote:
I guess my wisdom would be 'why'? What does this enable you to do that you
couldn't do with similar ease with the formats we have and
On 26/01/16 09:11 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:00:16AM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote:
I guess my wisdom would be 'why'? What does this enable you to do that you
couldn't do with similar ease with the formats we have and are people
trying to do that frequently.
We've
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:00:16AM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote:
> I guess my wisdom would be 'why'? What does this enable you to do that you
> couldn't do with similar ease with the formats we have and are people
> trying to do that frequently.
>
> We've seen in cinder that image formats have a def
Hi Duncan,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
> I guess my wisdom would be 'why'? What does this enable you to do that you
> couldn't do with similar ease with the formats we have and are people trying
> to do that frequently.
>
As far as i know the ironic only supports creati
On 23/01/16 09:08 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2016-01-23 06:54:26 -0800:
Please provide feedback about a proposal to add 'tar' as a new Glance
disk_format.[0]
The Ironic team is adding support for "OS tarball images" in Mitaka. This is a
compressed tar
I guess my wisdom would be 'why'? What does this enable you to do that you
couldn't do with similar ease with the formats we have and are people
trying to do that frequently.
We've seen in cinder that image formats have a definite security surface to
them, and with glance adding arbitrary conversi
Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2016-01-23 06:54:26 -0800:
> Please provide feedback about a proposal to add 'tar' as a new Glance
> disk_format.[0]
>
> The Ironic team is adding support for "OS tarball images" in Mitaka. This is
> a compressed tar archive of a / (root filesystem). Th
Please provide feedback about a proposal to add 'tar' as a new Glance
disk_format.[0]
The Ironic team is adding support for "OS tarball images" in Mitaka. This is a
compressed tar archive of a / (root filesystem). These tarballs are created by
first installing the OS packages in a chroot and t
11 matches
Mail list logo