Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

2018-02-05 Thread Brian Rosmaita
Thanks for following up on this, Abhishek. After our discussion approving this at the weekly meeting, I completely forgot to send out an update. As Abhishek indicated, the discussion was positive, and this FFE is APPROVED. cheers, brian On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Abhishek Kekane

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

2018-02-05 Thread Abhishek Kekane
Sorry, Forgot to add meeting logs link in previous mail. Here it is; http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2018/glance.2018-02-01-14.01.log.html#l-164 Thank you, Abhishek Kekane On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > We have discussed this in

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

2018-02-04 Thread Abhishek Kekane
We have discussed this in glance weekly meeting [1] and most of the core reviewers are inclined towards accepting this FFE. +1 from my side as this --check command will be very helpful for operators. Thank you Bhagyashri for working on this. Abhishek Kekane On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:29 PM,

[openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

2018-01-31 Thread Shewale, Bhagyashri
Hi Glance Folks, I'm requesting an Feature Freeze Exception for the lite-spec http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/glance-specs/specs/untargeted/glance/lite-spec-db-sync-check.html which is implemented by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455837/8/ Regards, Bhagyashri Shewale

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE Request

2017-01-26 Thread Brian Rosmaita
Update: The FFE for the Rolling Upgrades work was discussed at today's Glance meeting, and an FFE was granted. On 1/26/17 8:58 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > On 1/26/17 8:52 AM, Steve Lewis wrote: >> I'm requesting a FFE to enable us to complete the work described as the >> "Rolling Upgrades"

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE Request

2017-01-26 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On 1/26/17 8:52 AM, Steve Lewis wrote: > I'm requesting a FFE to enable us to complete the work described as the > "Rolling Upgrades" priority [0]. > Thanks, Steve. FFE exception requests are on the agenda for today's Glance meeting at 14:00 UTC. cheers, brian > > [0] >

[openstack-dev] [glance] FFE Request

2017-01-26 Thread Steve Lewis
I'm requesting a FFE to enable us to complete the work described as the "Rolling Upgrades" priority [0]. [0] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/glance-specs/priorities/ocata-priorities.html -- SteveL __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Glance] FFE request for parallel scrubbing

2015-09-10 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Hi, We had a request for this small spec [1] to be in Liberty. It addresses the concerns around parallel scrubbing performance improvements. The reason for asking for creating a spec was that it can rather affect performance negatively in some cases and a config is to help fine tune that. This

[openstack-dev] [Glance] FFE Request: Allow enabling both v1 and v2 registries

2014-03-13 Thread stuart . mclaren
Hi, Right now you can select running either the v1 or v2 registries but not both at the same time. I'd like to ask for an FFE for this functionality (Erno's patch in progress here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79957/) With v1 on the road to deprecation I think this may help migrating from a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] FFE Request: Allow enabling both v1 and v2 registries

2014-03-13 Thread Sean Dague
On 03/13/2014 08:00 AM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: Hi, Right now you can select running either the v1 or v2 registries but not both at the same time. I'd like to ask for an FFE for this functionality (Erno's patch in progress here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79957/) With v1 on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] FFE Request: Allow enabling both v1 and v2 registries

2014-03-13 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 13/03/14 09:32 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 03/13/2014 08:00 AM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: Hi, Right now you can select running either the v1 or v2 registries but not both at the same time. I'd like to ask for an FFE for this functionality (Erno's patch in progress here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE Request: Add swift_store_ssl_compression param

2013-09-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Mark Washenberger wrote: I buy an exception here if the configuration defaults to off (no change). +1 Also don't forget to mention that new configuration option to the Docs team to make sure they are aware of its late addition. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

[openstack-dev] [glance] FFE Request: Add swift_store_ssl_compression param

2013-09-09 Thread stuart . mclaren
This change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32919/ is the final piece of a puzzle that allows a (potentially significant) performance improvement for image uploads (snapshots)/downloads when using ssl. Its the last change required for the following paths: (nova/cinder) - (glance client) -

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE Request: Add swift_store_ssl_compression param

2013-09-09 Thread Thierry Carrez
stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: This change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32919/ is the final piece of a puzzle that allows a (potentially significant) performance improvement for image uploads (snapshots)/downloads when using ssl. I guess that's why I like puzzles being targeted to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE Request: Add swift_store_ssl_compression param

2013-09-09 Thread Mark Washenberger
I buy an exception here if the configuration defaults to off (no change). Thanks! On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: This change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32919/ is the final piece of a puzzle that allows a