Thanks all for the interest.
I have submitted a change at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268865/.
Please take a look and give your comments! (There are a few PEP errors that
I'll be correcting...)
Regards,
Jake
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Steve Lewis wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Jake Yip wrote:
>
> I am wondering anyone else have solved this before? I would like to hear
> your opinions on how we can achieve this, and whether ranking it by
> metadata is the way to go.
>
I spoke with an operator in Vancouver (Spring 2015 Summit) who wanted
On 14/01/16 11:07 +1100, Jake Yip wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently ran across a constraint in glance-api while working with image
locations. In essence, there is no way to customize ordering of image-locations
other than the default location strategies, namely location_order and
store_type [0]. It s
Hi Jake,
Thanks for raising this topic. I'm really interested in it. I reviewed
most of the locations patches of Glance, so drop my 2 cents about this.
So firstly, I think it's a valid user case. As for the implementation, I
think a spec-lite is enough, given it's just a driver for current
lo
Hi all,
I've recently ran across a constraint in glance-api while working with
image locations. In essence, there is no way to customize ordering of
image-locations other than the default location strategies, namely
location_order and store_type [0]. It seems like a more generic method of
ordering
