Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] security and swift multi-tenant fixes on stable branch

2014-11-14 Thread stuart . mclaren
On 2014-11-13 18:28:14 +0100 (+0100), Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: [...] I think those who maintain glance_store module in downstream distributions will cherry-pick the security fix into their packages, so there is nothing to do in terms of stable branches to handle the security issue. [...] As a

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] security and swift multi-tenant fixes on stable branch

2014-11-14 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 14/11/14 11:25 +, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: On 2014-11-13 18:28:14 +0100 (+0100), Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: [...] I think those who maintain glance_store module in downstream distributions will cherry-pick the security fix into their packages, so there is nothing to do in terms of

[openstack-dev] [glance] security and swift multi-tenant fixes on stable branch

2014-11-13 Thread stuart . mclaren
All, The 0.1.9 version of glance_store, and glance's master branch both contain some fixes for the Swift multi-tenant store. This security related change hasn't merged to glance_store yet: https://review.openstack.org/130200 I'd like to suggest that we try to merge this security fix and

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] security and swift multi-tenant fixes on stable branch

2014-11-13 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 13/11/14 18:17, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: All, The 0.1.9 version of glance_store, and glance's master branch both contain some fixes for the Swift multi-tenant store. This security related change hasn't merged to glance_store yet:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] security and swift multi-tenant fixes on stable branch

2014-11-13 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-11-13 18:28:14 +0100 (+0100), Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: [...] I think those who maintain glance_store module in downstream distributions will cherry-pick the security fix into their packages, so there is nothing to do in terms of stable branches to handle the security issue. [...] As a