Hi Gordon,
Thanks for your test results, we investigate more on our env, finally it
turns out that our ceph cluster isn't work as expected.
which made gnocchi performance decrease a lot.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:09 AM, gordon chung wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-10-18 12:15 PM, Yaguang
On 2017-10-18 12:15 PM, Yaguang Tang wrote:
>
> We launched 300vms and each vm has about 10 metrics, OpenStack cluster
> have 3 controllers and 2 compute nodes(ceph replication is set to 2).
seems smaller than my test, i have 20K metrics in my test
>
> what we want to archive is to make all
Hi Gordon,
We launched 300vms and each vm has about 10 metrics, OpenStack cluster have
3 controllers and 2 compute nodes(ceph replication is set to 2).
what we want to archive is to make all metric measures data get processed
as soon as possible, metric processing delay is set to 10s, and
On 2017-10-13 03:37 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13 2017, Yaguang Tang wrote:
>
>> I see the latest Gnocchi support using Redis as a storage backend, I am
>> testing performance of Redis and Ceph, it seems using Redis as storage
>> backend we can achieve more realtime metric
>> data,
On Fri, Oct 13 2017, Yaguang Tang wrote:
> I see the latest Gnocchi support using Redis as a storage backend, I am
> testing performance of Redis and Ceph, it seems using Redis as storage
> backend we can achieve more realtime metric
> data, gnocchi status shows there is always few metric to
Hi all,
I see the latest Gnocchi support using Redis as a storage backend, I am
testing performance of Redis and Ceph, it seems using Redis as storage
backend we can achieve more realtime metric
data, gnocchi status shows there is always few metric to process.
Is Redis a recommend storage