Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
On 03/12/2014 06:34 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a
nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect
this to work?
This sort of thing works fine for us. It needs some patches that missed
Havana, though.
{
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: 2010-09-09,
Description: Sample webserver config,
Resources: {
LBMonitor: {
Type: OS::Neutron::HealthMonitor,
Properties: {
delay: 3,
max_retries: 5,
url_path: /_,
type: HTTP,
timeout: 10
}
},
LaunchConfig: {
Type: AWS::AutoScaling::LaunchConfiguration,
Properties: {
},
SecurityGroups: [ { Ref: SecGroup } ],
InstanceType: m1.small,
ImageId: CentOS65-1312-1
}
},
ELB: {
Type: OS::Neutron::LoadBalancer,
Properties: {
protocol_port: 8080,
pool_id: { Ref: LBPool }
}
},
ASG: {
Version: 2009-05-15,
Type: AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup,
Properties: {
LaunchConfigurationName: { Ref: LaunchConfig },
MinSize: 1,
MaxSize: 2,
VPCZoneIdentifier: [ mumbleuuid ],
LoadBalancerNames: [ { Ref: ELB } ],
AvailabilityZones: { Fn::GetAZs: }
}
},
LBPool: {
Type: OS::Neutron::Pool,
Properties: {
lb_method: ROUND_ROBIN,
protocol: HTTP,
description: Test Pool,
subnet_id: mumbleuuid,
vip: {
protocol_port: 8080,
connection_limit: 1000,
description: Test,
name: Test
},
monitors: [ { Ref: LBMonitor } ],
name: test
}
},
SecGroup: {
Type: AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup,
Properties: {
SecurityGroupIngress: [
{
SourceSecurityGroupId: mumbleuuid,
IpProtocol: tcp,
ToPort: 8080,
FromPort: 8080
},
],
GroupDescription: Test
}
}
}
}
Cheers,
--
Stephen Gran
Senior Systems Integrator - theguardian.com
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
--
Visit theguardian.com
On your mobile, download the Guardian iPhone app theguardian.com/iphone and our iPad edition theguardian.com/iPad
Save up to 57% by subscribing to the Guardian and Observer - choose the papers you want and get full digital access.
Visit subscribe.theguardian.com
This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also
be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify
the sender and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use
the information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
Guardian News Media Limited is not liable for any computer
viruses or other material transmitted with or as part of this
e-mail. You should employ virus checking software.
Guardian News Media Limited
A member of Guardian Media Group plc
Registered Office
PO Box 68164
Kings Place
90 York Way
London
N1P 2AP
Registered in England Number 908396
--
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect this to work? Hi Mike, Yes I tested it and it works. I'm trying to build an example for heat-templates putting it all together. I'm mostly struggling with how to include the nested stack nicely (without a HTTP URL), but everything else seems fine. Cheers, -- Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Hi Chris, That's great to hear. I'm looking forward to installing icehouse and testing that out. :) Thanks, Kevin From: Chris Armstrong [chris.armstr...@rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:29 PM To: Fox, Kevin M; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Hi Kevin, The design of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup should not require explicit support for load balancers. The design is meant to allow you to create a resource that wraps up both a OS::Heat::Server and a PoolMember in a template and use it via a Stack resource. (Note that Mike was talking about the new OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup resource, not AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup). So, while I haven’t tested this case with PoolMember specifically, and there may still be bugs, no more feature implementation should be necessary (I hope). -- Christopher Armstrong IRC: radix On March 12, 2014 at 1:52:53 PM, Fox, Kevin M (kevin@pnnl.govmailto:kevin@pnnl.gov) wrote: I submitted a blueprint a while back that I think is relevant: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/elasticloadbalancing-lbaas Currently heat autoscaling doesn't interact with Neutron lbaas and the configurable bits aren't configurable enough to allow it without code changes as far as I can tell. I think its only a few days of work, but the OpenStack CLA is preventing me from contributing. :/ Thanks, Kevin From: Mike Spreitzer [mspre...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:34 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect this to work? Thanks, Mike ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Therve told me he actually tested this and it works. Now if I could only configure DevStack to install a working Neutron... Regards, Mike From: Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov To: Chris Armstrong chris.armstr...@rackspace.com, OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 03/13/2014 02:19 PM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Hi Chris, That's great to hear. I'm looking forward to installing icehouse and testing that out. :) Thanks, Kevin From: Chris Armstrong [chris.armstr...@rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:29 PM To: Fox, Kevin M; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Hi Kevin, The design of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup should not require explicit support for load balancers. The design is meant to allow you to create a resource that wraps up both a OS::Heat::Server and a PoolMember in a template and use it via a Stack resource. (Note that Mike was talking about the new OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup resource, not AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup). So, while I haven’t tested this case with PoolMember specifically, and there may still be bugs, no more feature implementation should be necessary (I hope). -- Christopher Armstrong IRC: radix On March 12, 2014 at 1:52:53 PM, Fox, Kevin M (kevin@pnnl.gov) wrote: I submitted a blueprint a while back that I think is relevant: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/elasticloadbalancing-lbaas Currently heat autoscaling doesn't interact with Neutron lbaas and the configurable bits aren't configurable enough to allow it without code changes as far as I can tell. I think its only a few days of work, but the OpenStack CLA is preventing me from contributing. :/ Thanks, Kevin From: Mike Spreitzer [mspre...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:34 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect this to work? Thanks, Mike ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect this to work? Thanks, Mike___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
I submitted a blueprint a while back that I think is relevant: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/elasticloadbalancing-lbaas Currently heat autoscaling doesn't interact with Neutron lbaas and the configurable bits aren't configurable enough to allow it without code changes as far as I can tell. I think its only a few days of work, but the OpenStack CLA is preventing me from contributing. :/ Thanks, Kevin From: Mike Spreitzer [mspre...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:34 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect this to work? Thanks, Mike ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Hi Kevin, The design of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup should not require explicit support for load balancers. The design is meant to allow you to create a resource that wraps up both a OS::Heat::Server and a PoolMember in a template and use it via a Stack resource. (Note that Mike was talking about the new OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup resource, not AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup). So, while I haven’t tested this case with PoolMember specifically, and there may still be bugs, no more feature implementation should be necessary (I hope). -- Christopher Armstrong IRC: radix On March 12, 2014 at 1:52:53 PM, Fox, Kevin M (kevin@pnnl.govmailto:kevin@pnnl.gov) wrote: I submitted a blueprint a while back that I think is relevant: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/elasticloadbalancing-lbaas Currently heat autoscaling doesn't interact with Neutron lbaas and the configurable bits aren't configurable enough to allow it without code changes as far as I can tell. I think its only a few days of work, but the OpenStack CLA is preventing me from contributing. :/ Thanks, Kevin From: Mike Spreitzer [mspre...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:34 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect this to work? Thanks, Mike ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
