> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 01:52:45PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 28 2015, Rabi Mishra wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, this has started happening after keystone/trusts config changes by
> > > the
> > > devstack patch you mentioned. I've no idea how this can be fixed. As
> > > Steve
> > >
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 01:52:45PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28 2015, Rabi Mishra wrote:
>
> > Yes, this has started happening after keystone/trusts config changes by the
> > devstack patch you mentioned. I've no idea how this can be fixed. As Steve
> > Hardy is away, either
>
> Hi,
>
> >> Which had a Depends-On to the devstack change, anyone know why that
> >> didn't
> >> fail with the CeilometerAlarmTest.test_alarm before the devstack
> >> change
> >> merged?
> >
> > It seems the test was skipped[1], as it was disabled for another
> > bug[2].
> >
> > [1]
> >
On Mon, Jan 04 2016, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi,
> Firstly, I'm very sorry for the breakage here, and I agree that in general
> a quick-revert is the best policy when something like this happens.
No problem Steven, shit happens.
It'd be even better if Heat'd move to a devstack plugin to limit this
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:31:40AM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04 2016, Steven Hardy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Firstly, I'm very sorry for the breakage here, and I agree that in general
> > a quick-revert is the best policy when something like this happens.
>
> No problem Steven, shit
Hi,
Which had a Depends-On to the devstack change, anyone know why that
didn't
fail with the CeilometerAlarmTest.test_alarm before the devstack
change
merged?
It seems the test was skipped[1], as it was disabled for another
bug[2].
[1]
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:31:40AM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04 2016, Steven Hardy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Firstly, I'm very sorry for the breakage here, and I agree that in general
> > a quick-revert is the best policy when something like this happens.
>
> No problem Steven, shit
Hi there,
The gate for telemetry projects is broken:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1529583
The failure appears in Heat from what I understand:
BadRequest: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not
comply with the request since it is either malformed or otherwise
Hi, Julien.
I suppose, that your guess is right.
Mentioned patch was merged recently and it broke our Ceilometer related
functional test.
There is a patch, which skip it. [1] and related bug [2]
We already have a revert for this staff [3] and patch for check based on
this revert [4].
[1]
> Hi there,
>
> The gate for telemetry projects is broken:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1529583
>
> The failure appears in Heat from what I understand:
>
> BadRequest: Expecting to find domain in project - the server could not
> comply with the request since it is either
On Mon, Dec 28 2015, Rabi Mishra wrote:
> Yes, this has started happening after keystone/trusts config changes by the
> devstack patch you mentioned. I've no idea how this can be fixed. As Steve
> Hardy is away, either someone with keystone knowledge should fix this or we
> merge the devstack
11 matches
Mail list logo
