Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Midcycle Summary

2016-07-22 Thread Matthias Runge
On 22/07/16 09:38, Rob Cresswell wrote: > We didn't discuss it explicitly, but I don't believe the decision has > changed. We can remove it, but last I checked the patches in line to > handle testing after deprecation still needed work. If they've been > updated etc. I can look again. > > Rob > P

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Midcycle Summary

2016-07-22 Thread Rob Cresswell
We didn't discuss it explicitly, but I don't believe the decision has changed. We can remove it, but last I checked the patches in line to handle testing after deprecation still needed work. If they've been updated etc. I can look again. Rob On 22 July 2016 at 07:52, Matthias Runge mailto:mru

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Midcycle Summary

2016-07-21 Thread Matthias Runge
On 21/07/16 19:40, Rob Cresswell wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We had the Horizon mid cycle meetup last week, and I wanted to highlight > some of the discussion and decisions made. > > Agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-newton-midcycle > Notes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Midcycle Summary

2016-07-21 Thread Rob Cresswell
Hi everyone, We had the Horizon mid cycle meetup last week, and I wanted to highlight some of the discussion and decisions made. Agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-newton-midcycle Notes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-newton-midcycle-notes - Deprecation of table inline e